now, the besign interpretation of what occurred today is that perhaps these senators, and i don t sub prescribe to this, but i m going to say it, perhaps these senators were trying to send a message to donald trump. an intervention. maybe it was. he watches television and here is what these allies of his have said, that you haven t grabbed the you don t understand the character of the nation and that you need to grab this mantle of leadership. i believe they were being critical, but, you know, you could also say, look, maybe he s going to listen if we actually say it directly to the camera. i think it s kind of like a, you know, a hail mary in a way like we have to get out there and say this because it s what we believe and he needs to hear it from us. gloria david, hang on. we ll have more to discuss. but the president can disband as many presidential advisor panels
think. like after after five minutes i thought about it. i guess yes and no. you kind of don t want to think it is, you know. you want to think it was maybe just a small accident or something. but to this point i still didn t know it had driven down it had dlirch down half of the rambler. that s pretty far. at this point i thought it mounted the curve nearly and just kind of hit some of the kiosks and stuff. i didn t no-know what was happening. and then you look at the ones that happened with respect to london and you think the same thing. you immediately think it s linked to that. we re so glad you re safe tonight. liam searle. thank you for being on the
consider them christians. they know it would offend millions of christians who don t identify with that horrendous belief system. yet, we don t have that concern with how many millions of muslims we re offending by using that phrase. that s the key point. it s the moral imaginatioimagin. the idea of inclusion, it s about that our civilization actually stands for ideas that are inclusive. one of the things that makes being an american unique, it is not your race. it is never your race. it s all about do you subscribe to an idea, an ideal that s open to anybody? and that s the fundamental division. whether the president s intentionally doing this or not, i think it is part of a troubling pattern. you mentioned the phrase globalist as code. we see that term as an insult emanating from some folks in the white house.
be successful. he s not just saying he disagreed with the president. he s saying he s not sure the president can do the job. does that concern you? i m not sure he s saying that exactly. and i ll wait to see. what? we ll see what he says further to clarify his remarks. i don t think he s abandoning the president. he says he hasn t demonstrated it yet. you have a new chief of staff who is going through with a fine tooth comb, job descriptions and organizing things. there has been a removal of the communications director. the president recognizes changes need to be made and they re making changes. he s entitled to his own opinion. but i don t think this is a wholesale abandonment of the president by the republican party like everyone is painting it to be. i m not painting it that way. please don t understand me to be that way at all. but you we re kind of