instinctive, where he had to push woodward. and how you have to rewrite me because you re a better writer. and you do it without even thinking how bruised it s going to be. woodward was didactic. if that s the right word. he would go a, b, c, d in his investigative work. and bernstein would go a, b, h. we had the luxury of a fat, dynamic institution in the washington post, it was right at its peak. it s always been some chicannery in american politics, you re always going to have some underhanded dealings. nothing comparable to this. ended up that woodward and bernstein ushered in a new era of journalism that opened up the white house in a way that would have made lbj and jfk and fdr very uncomfortable. marcus, everyone asks the question, could the post do a story like watergate or do watergate now? what is your you know, in today s world that story would catch fire much faster. the minute the break-in
how right he was. you know, at the same time totally intuitive, totally instincti instinctive, where he had to push woodward. and you re rewriting me because you re a better writer. and you do it without even thinking how bruised it s going to be. woodward was, if the right word is, didactic. he would go a, b, c, d in his investigative work. and bernstein would go a, b, h. we had the luxury of a fat dynamic institution in the washington post, it was right at its peak. there has always been some chicanery in american politics, you re always going to have some underhanded dealings. nothing comparable to this. ended up that woodward and bernstein ushered in a new era of journalism that opened up the white house in a way that would have made lbj and jfk and fdr very uncomfortable. marcus, everyone asks the question, could the post do a story like watergate or do watergate now? what is your
i don t mind what you did. i mind the way you did it. the thing about bernstein that i think you captured so well was his assuredness about how right he was, at the same time, totally intuitive and instinctive, where he had to push woodward. and how you have to rewrite me because you re a better writer. and you do it without even thinking. woodward was didactic. he would go a, b, c, d in his investigative work. and bernstein would go a, b, h. we had the luxury of a fat, dynamic institution in the washington post, it was right at its peak. there has always been some chicannery in american politics, you re always going to have some underhanded dealings. nothing comparable to this. ended up that woodward and bernstein ushered in a new era of journalism that opened up the white house in a way that would have made lbj and jfk and fdr very uncomfortable.
that i think you captured so well was his assuredness about how right he was, at the same time, totally intuitive and instinctive, how he had to push woodward. and how you have to rewrite me because you re a better writer. and you do it without even thinking how bruised it would be. woodward was didactic. he would go a, b, c, d in his investigative work. and bernstein would go a, b, h. we had the luxury of a fat dynamic institution in the washington post, it was right at its peak. there has always been some chicannery in american politics, you re always going to have some underhanded dealings. nothing comparable to this. ended up that woodward and bernstein ushered in a new era of journal iism that opened up e
time, totally intuitive and instinctive, how he had to push woodward. and how you have to rewrite me because you re a better writer. and you do it without even thinking. woodward was didactic. he would go a, b, c, d in his investigative work. and bernstein would go a, b, h. we had the luxury of a fat dynamic institution in the washington post, it was right at its peak. there has always been some chicannery in american politics, you re always going to have some underhanded dealings. nothing comparable to this. ended up they ushered in a new era of journalism that opened up the white house in a way that would have made lbj and jfk and fdr very uncomfortable. marcus, everyone asks the question, could the post do a story like watergate or do watergate now? what is your you know, in today s world that story would catch fire much faster.