time, totally intuitive and instinctive, how he had to push woodward. and how you have to rewrite me because you re a better writer. and you do it without even thinking. woodward was didactic. he would go a, b, c, d in his investigative work. and bernstein would go a, b, h. we had the luxury of a fat dynamic institution in the washington post, it was right at its peak. there has always been some chicannery in american politics, you re always going to have some underhanded dealings. nothing comparable to this. ended up they ushered in a new era of journalism that opened up the white house in a way that would have made lbj and jfk and fdr very uncomfortable. marcus, everyone asks the question, could the post do a
i mind the way you did it. the thing about bernstein that i think you captured so well was his assuredness about how right he was, you know. at the same time totally intuitive, totally instinctive where he had to push woodward, and you re rewriting me because you re a better writer and you do it without even thinking how bruised it s going to be. woodward was, if the right word is, didactic. he would go a, b, c, d in his investigative work, and bernstein would go a, b, c, h. it was right at its peak. there s always been some chick cannery in american politics. you re always going to have some underhanded dealings. nothing comparable to this. ended up that woodward and bernstein ushered in a new era of journalism.
the assuredness how right he was yet totally instinctive where he had to push woodward, and you re pushing me because you re a better writer because you do it without thinking how bruised it could get. woodwood, if the word is he would go a, b, c, d, and his investigative work and bernstein went a, b, h. we had the luxury of a fat dynamic institution. it was right at its peak. there s always been some mechanics in american politics, some under handed dealings incomparable to this. ends up that woodward and bernstein opened up the white house in a way that would have been lbj, jfk, and fdr very uncomfortable. marcus, everyone asks the question, could the post do a story like watergate or do
how right he was. you know, at the same time totally intuitive, totally instincti instinctive, where he had to push woodward. and you re rewriting me because you re a better writer. and you do it without even thinking how bruised it s going to be. woodward was, if the right word is, didactic. he would go a, b, c, d in his investigative work. and bernstein would go a, b, h. we had the luxury of a fat dynamic institution in the washington post, it was right at its peak. there has always been some chicanery in american politics, you re always going to have some underhanded dealings. nothing comparable to this. ended up that woodward and bernstein ushered in a new era of journalism that opened up the white house in a way that would have made lbj and jfk and fdr very uncomfortable. marcus, everyone asks the question, could the post do a story like watergate or do watergate now? what is your
i don t mind what you did. i mind the way you did it. the thing about bernstein that i think you captured so well was his assuredness about how right he was, at the same time, totally intuitive and instinctive, where he had to push woodward. and how you have to rewrite me because you re a better writer. and you do it without even thinking. woodward was didactic. he would go a, b, c, d in his investigative work. and bernstein would go a, b, h. we had the luxury of a fat, dynamic institution in the washington post, it was right at its peak. there has always been some chicannery in american politics, you re always going to have some underhanded dealings. nothing comparable to this. ended up that woodward and bernstein ushered in a new era of journalism that opened up the white house in a way that would have made lbj and jfk and fdr very uncomfortable.