Pictures. Afraid he will catch me picking my nose. Cant believe that guy was president of the United States. Because he is branded as a crook. Its important to remember the wrong approach that Executive Power that led nixon to those crimes. You want a level, dont you . Good evening. This is the 37th time i have spoken to from you this office. So many decisions have been made that shape the history of our nation. Need more . There was good in him. He had been a good vicepresident. But he was fatally flawed and a fatally flawed president. Nixon, he had been a hero to millions of americans. Here is a guy who received more votes than anybody else in the history of this country. The Richard Nixon they supported through the years was not the Richard Nixon that they thought
they knew. Every generation has to lose their virginity. It was just the day that my generation did. To think that were the only generation that had that experience is probably the mistake that a lot of generations make. H
totally intuitive and distinctive where he pushed woodward, you re rewriting me because you re a better writer and you do it without even thinking how bruised it s going to be. woodward is didactic. he would go a, b, c, d in his investigative work and bernstein would go a, b, h. we had the luxury of a fat dynamic institution, the washington post. it was right at its peak. you re always going to have some underhanded dealings, but nothing comparable to this. it ended up that woodward and bernstein ushered in a new era of journalism that opened up the white house in a way that would have made lbj and jfk and fdr very uncomfortable. everyone asks the question could the post do a story like watergate or do watergate now. what s your you know, in today s world,
assu assua assu assureness of how right he was. you are rewriting me was a better writer and you do it without any bruises. woodward was go, a, b, c, d in his investigative work. bernstein would go a, b, h. we had a luxury of ins institution of its post. it would be right at its peak. you are always going to have some under handed dealings. nothing comparable to this. woodward and bernstein issued a new myriad of journalism, making jfk and fdr very uncomfortable. you know in today s world
time, totally intuitive and instinctive, how he had to push woodward. and how you have to rewrite me because you re a better writer. and you do it without even thinking. woodward was didactic. he would go a, b, c, d in his investigative work. and bernstein would go a, b, h. we had the luxury of a fat dynamic institution in the washington post, it was right at its peak. there has always been some chicannery in american politics, you re always going to have some underhanded dealings. nothing comparable to this. ended up they ushered in a new era of journalism that opened up the white house in a way that would have made lbj and jfk and fdr very uncomfortable. marcus, everyone asks the question, could the post do a
i mind the way you did it. the thing about bernstein that i think you captured so well was his assuredness about how right he was, you know. at the same time totally intuitive, totally instinctive where he had to push woodward, and you re rewriting me because you re a better writer and you do it without even thinking how bruised it s going to be. woodward was, if the right word is, didactic. he would go a, b, c, d in his investigative work, and bernstein would go a, b, c, h. it was right at its peak. there s always been some chick cannery in american politics. you re always going to have some underhanded dealings. nothing comparable to this. ended up that woodward and bernstein ushered in a new era of journalism.