investigators. with us to discuss cnn legal analyst who has worked closely with robert mueller and cnn political analyst congress nal correspondent for the washington post . fbi agents actually warn the hope hicks they were trying to contact her. the what do you see as significant? it s interesting because they attempted to reach out to hope hicks during the transition. so we see here a continuum of efforts between the trump campaign and the russians or if you want to put it most benignly, russians reaching out to trump campaign officials from pre election through the transition. and so you ask what is up about that in a sense, and if you want to look at it in conspiratorial terms, you think that this is maybe just another effort by the russians to try to impact policy, and that is perhaps born
18-year-old in the case of a michael brown, has gone through and resulted in tragedy. so they ve seen this. so for him to express it publicly, i think is something for those of us who sort of benignly go through a sporting event and think about oh, you know, how much touchdowns the athletes will get. sort of get clued in that these guys are more than that. they re raising an important issue that we re thinking about. professor dyson, what did you think? absolutely right. i thought that if this is representative of the police perspective, and this guy obviously, as a human being, we can say, i don t know him, but this seems seems like a decent human being. you re so dangerous and problematic. you hide behind an innocence and then you project a kind of invincibility that is good when you re in the heat of battle. but horrible when it comes to admitting that you need to be self refleblgtive and consider the opposite view.
environments and e and cultures and systems that they ve been challenged in. so they know what this 12-year-old or, you know, abe an 18-year-old in the case of a michael brown, has gone through and resulted in tragedy. so they ve seen this. so for him to express it publicly, i think is something for those of us who sort of benignly go through a sporting event and think about oh, you know, how much touchdowns the athletes will get. sort of get clued in that these guys are more than that. they re raising an important issue that we re thinking about. professor dyson, what did you think? absolutely right. i thought that if this is representative of the police perspective, and this guy obviously, as a human being, we can say, i don t know him, but this seems seems like a decent human being. you re so dangerous and problematic. you hide behind an innocence and then you project a kind of invincibility that is good when you re in the heat of battle. but horrible when it comes to admitting
been progress is to have killed far more people in this country. john: they don t just want to invade. what is the philosophy behind it? they ultimately want to remake the world in our image. that is what they have said. that is what progressivism always has been about. remaking the people in the ghettos in our image many elite white americans and remaking of the united people of the world in our image as well. john: as you say, domestically it goes well beyond that. we can make education better. we must run education, health care. we must police the work force. we can make everything better. government can do that benignly. that s right. it is uplifting the poor and oppressed through the means of the state, through that monopoly on violence. domestically that is taxation and law-enforcement brought for military force. very consistent. john: no matter how often it fails, they continue to support that. so thank you. coming up, what does the
been progress is to have killed far more people in this country. john: they don t just want to invade. what is the philosophy behind it? they ultimately want to remake the world in our image. that is what they have said. that is what progressivism always has been about. remaking the people in the ghettos in our image many elite white americans and remaking of the united people of the world in our image as well. john: as you say, domestically it goes well beyond that. we can make education better. we must run education, health care. we must police the work force. we can make everything better. government can do that benignly. that s right. it is uplifting the poor and oppressed through the means of the state, through that monopoly on violence. domestically that is taxation and law-enforcement brought for military force. very consistent. john: no matter how often it fails, they continue to support that. so thank you. coming up, what does the