The washington journal this morning. We send you over to live coverage of the d. C. Circuit court of appeals. [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. Visit ncicap. Org] [captions Copyright National cable satellite corp. 2020] these adding unconstitutional burdens of process to punish michael flynn, judge sullivan discarded any semblance of an impartial adjudicator that he had been extolled. As the cornerstone of any system of justice worth the label. Four rulings are required to conclude this article. The judges position must be flatly denied with clear language the judge has no standing to seek relief in this because hee ruling has invested himself in his prosecution of general flynn, there is now a glaring appearance of bias to millions of citizens. Requires the vacation of and forth, they must compel the District Court to grant the dismissal as a matter of law. Only department of justice can decide the Pu
It is great to be here back in a place and i want to thank Wayne Jefferson here for having us everybody knew who hicks was he was deeply involved in social justice issues talk politics in the state for a long time and was very much engaged back in the days when doctor king was assassinated in the city was in flames. He was a good friend. I used to work on the east side and i got to know hicks very well because he did a lot of work over there as well and folks here at this center are doing gods work this Community Center gives people hope and a place to belong i saw hope as a senator when i watch my son become attorney general he would attend mass at sacred heart just up the street and then walk with his notebook in hand sit around for the day to see if he could find ways to help. And on the east side as a teenage lifeguard my career as a public defender started. And he is named after my buddy. We went way back. We just walked around wilmington and everybody has a story about hicks and
It is great to be here back in a place and i want to thank Wayne Jefferson here for having us everybody knew who hicks was he was deeply involved in social justice issues talk politics in the state for a long time and was very much engaged back in the days when doctor king was assassinated in the city was in flames. He was a good friend. I used to work on the east side and i got to know hicks very well because he did a lot of work over there as well and folks here at this center are doing gods work this Community Center gives people hope and a place to belong i saw hope as a senator when i watch my son become attorney general he would attend mass at sacred heart just up the street and then walk with his notebook in hand sit around for the day to see if he could find ways to help. And on the east side as a teenage lifeguard my career as a public defender started. And he is named after my buddy. We went way back. We just walked around wilmington and everybody has a story about hicks and
Versus regions of the university of california and related cases. General francisco, general francisco. In 2017, the fifth circuit held that dhaka and expansion were likely unlawful. Face of those decisions, the department of Homeland Security determined that it no longer wish to retain the policy based on its belief that the policy was illegal, has doubt about its illegality, and its general opposition to broad, nonenforcement policies. That decision did not violate the apa for two reasons. First, it is not subject to judicial review. Previousion ended a nonenforcement policy by which the department agreed to not enforce the ima against hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens. The decision whether or not to enforce the law is committed to the unreviewable discretion, unless the statute restricts it. Nothing in the ina requires the department, a Law Enforcement agency, do not enforce the law. Decision to and this nonenforcement policy was reasonable. Dr. Was a temporary measure that on
Daca and the expansion of daca were likely unlawful. In the face of those decisions, the department of Homeland Security reasonably determined that it no longer wished to do wish to retain the policy, based on its belief the policy was illegal, and its general opposition to broad nonenforcement policies. The decision did not violate the apa for two reasons. First, it is not subject to judicial review. The decision is committed to the unreviewable discretion unless a statute restricts it, and nothing requires the department, a Law Enforcement agency, to not enforce the law. Second, the decision to end this nonenforcement policy was eminently reasonable. Was a temporary stopgap measure that on its face could be rescinded at any time, and the departments reasonable concerns about its legality in general opposition to broad nonenforcement policies provided more than a reasonable basis for ending it. After all, an agency is not required to push its legally dubious power to not enforce the l