attesting to the judge, we have made good faith efforts to get these back. this is the level of secrecy that exists around these documents, despite the good faith efforts and a signed attestation that they handed everything over that we re still going to need to do the search. it was good enough far judge, and of course that judge had access to all of it not just the now underacketed portions which is part of a lawsuit that we have pressed to get as much access as possible for the underlying information. garrett haake for us, thank you, appreciate it. let s go to philadelphia where we re learning more about the man who police say shot and killed five people on the fourth of july. nbc s tom winter is on this for us. what are we learning? reporter: what we re learning is a little bit more about the social media background as well as the individual s mental health, and those are two of several components that authorities will use to try and determine a motive. we know that there was
corcoran s shoes having penned an attestation, even if christina bobb signs it at the end of the probe. yeah, this was a part of the investigation and throughout, this is largely explaining where trump is today facing the criminal charges. that s because he was very reticent all along, as was one of his colleagues boris epshteyn, with taking the posture with the federal government, with the national archives, in returning these materials that they have demanded repeatedly over the course of really a year and a half. so this time period after the justice department and the fbi executed a search warrant of mar-a-lago, and december, when investigators were still skeptical that trump had returned all of the materials is a really important one. and three of these lawyers
saying, bring me some of the boxes that we borrowed back from the white house, i d like to look at them. i would have the right to do that. there s nothing wrong with it. when it comes to your documents, did you ever show those classified documents to anyone. not really. i would have the right to. i had every right to have these documents. i hadn t had a chance to go through all the boxes. it s a long, tedious job, it takes a long time. which i was prepared to do but i have a very busy life. rinado, donald trump does have attorneys now who have signed a form an attestation saying they will represent him. one has already gotten $3 million. check mark on that, good for him. will they even be able to legally go in and attempt to make the arguments you just heard in the court of law. wouldn t they risk debarment? to say that gobble degook in
OCR proposed rule to modify HIPAA to protect privacy with respect to protected health information PHI related to reproductive health care, which is open for comment until June 16th, to combat state actions that impinge upon individuals’ reproductive health privacy
shot while walt nauta does not. can i read you my favorite line from this lawyer, this attestation from the lawyers who are going to represent donald trump. the best line in it is fee disputes between counsel and client shall not be a basis for withdrawal for this presentation, because he probably gave them the three million like he had to do last time for mr. keys and had to pay him up front. walt nauta doesn t have $3 million. it is this we re power dynamic. and i was actually going to ask you, if you don t mind, can walt nauta be a witness in the case against trump? because he is also a defendant. doesn t he have fifth amendment if for some reason donald trump could show the judge that he needs to call walt nauta as a witness i don t think that s going to happen. but there is a provision. if you can show that your co-defendant needs to be a witness and that the co-defendant is willing to testify. in other words, that he is going to actually take the stand and not assert the fi