here s what we got. that attestation, signed by lawyers, turned out there was a lot more stuff. if that was intentionally false, that would be that crime. we also know there s a charge of conspiracy. any two or more people who reach a meeting of the minds in an agreement. that tells us that somebody else was involve, at least one other person with donald trump and agreed to commit this crime with him, and finally, we know that there is at least one charge for false statements and that could get back to the same certification. we have a good sense of what s in there. there s a lot we need to find out. that s what i want to ask you about. at least on one side of things, conspiracy, there s got to be somebody else involved. what else do we not know at this point in time. important to know what we don t know. when is this thing going to be unsealed. when will we get to see it. the latest that will happen is at the arraignment, tuesday at 3:00 p.m. this is up to doj, if they decide th
longer an issue, trying to recall events exactly. you want to do it immediately. he didn t sign the attestation. talk about protecting yourself. you guys did a great job of laying out how sensitive this material was. but my takeaways here, they recovered over 300 classified documents, right, talking volume, that s what distinguishes this. of course in the case of the current president. and they were stored in everything from a ballroom to a bathroom to a shower to an office space to his bedroom to a st storage room. there s a photo where there s information only to be shared with the five, australia, canada, the united kingdom, spilled out on a box, as we have in an attic, old college papers. these are classified secrets spread across the floor of a storage room and there were secrets in a bathroom, a ballroom. the sloppiness in terms of storage, it s breathtaking. again, we ve been reporting on this for some time. this is surprising. not only that, we know that
that jay bratt discussed a pending judicial application that one of the lawyers involved in this case had submitted. and it was in the context of trying to get his client to flip on trump. in this case, the client was none other than the valet, and this wasn t going to be an issue, i think, until roseburg, the chief judge in d.c., requested that lawyer submit an attestation basically a letter confirming the allegation, and they did so yesterday. now, he seems to be treating that very seriously, and even if this doesn t result in anything, the fact that this is now pending before the chief judge, i think, suggests a degree of seriousness we might not have seen beforehand. anthony, there allegation trump put on his truth social wasn t truthful. there s no allegation being made that mr. bratt said hey, you might get a judgeship in the
each time, you don t get all of them. we know that as a matter of fact. those are the facts. the question about whether the reason for that. at one point, you get and attestation signed by a lawyer being like, we ve searched high and low. this is as best we can tell it s everything. then you get a search by the fbi of 100 more dogs. while someone was wrong. someone screwed this up. yeah? the certification that was given at the time was largely a form, standard form certification, saying diligent search has been conducted. here are responsive documents. in retrospect, could you sit here and say maybe it would have been smarter to say, all response of documents that were found were attached? i don t think that in the ordinary courts of things, that is what prosecutors of the other side would understand it to be. he did use a standard form for that.