more aside, it struck me this is more of aside, it struck me this is more of this court engaging in social more of this court engaging in social engineering, that they believe social engineering, that they believe they are the last word on how believe they are the last word on how society and structure should on how society and structure should work and while does not matter~ should work and while does not matter. . ., , matter. the court set affirmative matter. the court set affirmative action - matter. the court set affirmative action is l matter. the court set - affirmative action is social engineering, correct? wright and thomas engineering, correct? wright and thomas pozner - engineering, correct? wright and thomas pozner opinion | engineering, correct? wright - and thomas pozner opinion talks about and thomas pozner opinion talks about how and thomas pozner opinion talks about how race itself is a social about how race itself is a social construct, it s not real
so. know what we have is a situation where about 230 pages of opinion so everyone is passing it out and digesting it and to michaela s point it will take 45 days before universities and colleges can begin to look at what to do and understand how to comply with the law and that is historically the role of the department of education and the department of education and the department of education and the department ofjustice to issue guidance in situations like this. as, guidance in situations like this. ., ., , , this. a quick follow-up, this has been this. a quick follow-up, this has been a this. a quick follow-up, this has been a president - this. a quick follow-up, this has been a president but. has been a president but affirmative action has also been chipped away by courts in recent years. why do you think that we have seen this ruling now? in that we have seen this ruling now? , ., , ., now? in terms of why we have seen this now? in terms of why we have seen this ruling
to colourblindness. as adherence however is a bit ahistorical we look at the history of the 14th amendment as well as the true meaning of brown versus what of education, something thatjustice roberts something that justice roberts was something thatjustice roberts was using quite a bit in his speech. i was using quite a bit in his seech. ., i. . a was using quite a bit in his seech. ., i. . .,, speech. i want your check as well because speech. i want your check as well because the speech. i want your check as well because the chief- speech. i want your check as | well because the chiefjustice wrote harvard s admission process races on the stereotype a black student can usually bring something a white person cannot offer, as clarence thomas is that these programmes are unconstitutional. share thomas is that these programmes are unconstitutional. are unconstitutional. are they? i don t are unconstitutional. are they? i don t think are unconstitutional. are they? i don t think they