Bottle necks in the network. We have some key ones that are causing liability and one of them is not having the runtcy through the facilities. Its a significant issue if something goes wrong in one of those areas the rail is cut off. So we said want to start the discussions and do that under that scenario but to help improve the next time performance. It could be looking Revenue Service in the future that would be definitely part of it because whatever we can do to prevent redundancy. Were not sure how much dialing detail into this study and a could it be that there needs to be some kind of reference to the bus rapid study for geneva after it would be necessary to have it in the report if it goes to the mta report the mta should look at the high ridership. And is the mta looking at the redundancy of the light rail vehicle and the light transit on the same system is it possible. Understand that the rail piece would be longterm, the bus transit would be shortterm and the next in the next
Is to take vague of the federal map legislation 3 will help us to identify the local identification earlier and keep it within the document. A significant amount of effort was exerted in the vanessa document after the circulation and incorporating that into the final document we can save a significant amount of time. We think the project will allow early deployment of side running improvements in the inner gary and those could be deployed that eventually well have the Service Provided peril. Mta and ta are embracing the idea so the people can see the improvements. And mta is very focused on the low cost improvements immediately fund the certification of the environmental document. In fact, mta has announced the goals by mid 2014 in the mid gary area. Looking at oiflg a locally identified alternative in the document there are a couple of options that we think have the potential of becoming the alternative. And their depektd here. It would include the option to provide a filed at fillmor
Improve the next time performance. It could be looking Revenue Service in the future that would be definitely part of it because whatever we can do to prevent redundancy. Were not sure how much dialing detail into this study and a could it be that there needs to be some kind of reference to the bus rapid study for geneva after it would be necessary to have it in the report if it goes to the mta report the mta should look at the high ridership. And is the mta looking at the redundancy of the light rail vehicle and the light transit on the same system is it possible. Understand that the rail piece would be longterm, the bus transit would be shortterm and the next in the next couple of years. Thats what people want tongs we have some redundancy in the light rail system so we can make some improvements and not create a complete disaster if one goes down. We could see what the demand ridership is to further include the bus system we will look at that. Appreciate that. Colleagues any other p
Involved with the item open gary boulevard since 1986 and back then i was appointed to the gary Transit Task Force to look at the feasibility of the gary light rail system and this sort of thing but it was put in the sales tax passage. The gary light rail project is the only project that was grandfathered. And the gary Rapid Transit project is supposed to be rail ready. Also you have to remember that its a central sub by the way, theres a stop at the union square and theres a spur at union square for the gary light rail system and youre going to have to go before the voters to authorize and extend that. So you have to take the all that take into consideration. And also the way the gary Task Force Final report came out we would have a service from gary and market to gary and laguna and go out the center strip to fillmore to masonic and straight out to the beach. Read the final report of the gary task force and it was published in 1990 and all the other work published regarding a light r
Improvements in the inner gary and those could be deployed that eventually well have the Service Provided peril. Mta and ta are embracing the idea so the people can see the improvements. And mta is very focused on the low cost improvements immediately fund the certification of the environmental document. In fact, mta has announced the goals by mid 2014 in the mid gary area. Looking at oiflg a locally identified alternative in the document there are a couple of options that we think have the potential of becoming the alternative. And their depektd here. It would include the option to provide a filed at fillmore in order to reconnect the community that maybe as much of a land use and Community Issue as a transportation issue by those optioned will allow this to be done. Side lynn b r t would be provided and the center lane b r t to 22 avenue and a consolidated bus service further to the west. Other maples of accelerating deliver including looking at number one traditionally means of deli