In terms of that shorter deliver process. Given the challenges that mta has had and in delivering the projects in a time effective way why should we be confident this is real. Thats a question to staff. Through the chair thats an excellent quo. Basically youre saying why should you trust us lets be clear this isnt about the mta this is a boarder issue why should i trust the process in general. This is not a hit or criticism directed at the city staff if you feel compelled to stand up. But back to this particular project we also at that time, point have had the ability to absorb some of the lessons and we have some understanding of the rapid bus transit so we you shouldnt have to have the same discussions oh, again. Another part that will go towards the credibility this is not a Rocket Scientist case. We can start to get some of the improvements only the ground and that will build more conversations we can deliver and tim can speak to i know there was a presentation speaking to the Mayo
Is to take vague of the federal map legislation 3 will help us to identify the local identification earlier and keep it within the document. A significant amount of effort was exerted in the vanessa document after the circulation and incorporating that into the final document we can save a significant amount of time. We think the project will allow early deployment of side running improvements in the inner gary and those could be deployed that eventually well have the Service Provided peril. Mta and ta are embracing the idea so the people can see the improvements. And mta is very focused on the low cost improvements immediately fund the certification of the environmental document. In fact, mta has announced the goals by mid 2014 in the mid gary area. Looking at oiflg a locally identified alternative in the document there are a couple of options that we think have the potential of becoming the alternative. And their depektd here. It would include the option to provide a filed at fillmor
Basically youre saying why should you trust us lets be clear this isnt about the mta this is a boarder issue why should i trust the process in general. This is not a hit or criticism directed at the city staff if you feel compelled to stand up. But back to this particular project we also at that time, point have had the ability to absorb some of the lessons and we have some understanding of the rapid bus transit so we you shouldnt have to have the same discussions oh, again. Another part that will go towards the credibility this is not a Rocket Scientist case. We can start to get some of the improvements only the ground and that will build more conversations we can deliver and tim can speak to i know there was a presentation speaking to the Mayors Office that theyre under talking to deliver the larger and Small Projects and a director for the strategic planning. I think supervisor wiener and other directors youve made the point very clear. Were acutely aware of this issue. Were looking
The transit and bart. But the bus Rapid Transit systems as a number of those in administratrix city are an important way to connect up. I appreciate the sharp criticisms that supervisor wiener has brought up to help me and many that so for the the b a r t. So we can complete the virile report and fully develop now a alternatives has so much promise i hope youll please support that. Join me many helping this to move forward thank you. We havent called those items. Item 19 increase the professional contract by 9 million plus not to exceed 8 hundred million for a environmental rapid gary project and the environmental report slash statement and also the modification of the project. Appropriate the m k prop funds for environmental analysis and help the gary project environmental report slash statement. The cash flow distribution schedule and the 5 year program. In the an action item very good. I want to thank commissioner mar for his comments and ed wiener during the finance commission. It
Improvements in the inner gary and those could be deployed that eventually well have the Service Provided peril. Mta and ta are embracing the idea so the people can see the improvements. And mta is very focused on the low cost improvements immediately fund the certification of the environmental document. In fact, mta has announced the goals by mid 2014 in the mid gary area. Looking at oiflg a locally identified alternative in the document there are a couple of options that we think have the potential of becoming the alternative. And their depektd here. It would include the option to provide a filed at fillmore in order to reconnect the community that maybe as much of a land use and Community Issue as a transportation issue by those optioned will allow this to be done. Side lynn b r t would be provided and the center lane b r t to 22 avenue and a consolidated bus service further to the west. Other maples of accelerating deliver including looking at number one traditionally means of deli