not demonnize the youth, and instead suggests finding more places for them is spend time. fired up on this, we ll be joined live coming up. i truly believe they were there to kill me. so faced with this, i did what i knew i had to do to save my life. i stabbed that man in self-defense. but when the police came, even though i was injured myself, i was placed under arrest. it was hard to believe what my son looked like. face was beaten, open and shut case. and bragg is moving the case along with no solution, offering deal after deal. he dismissed, completely dismissed gang assault and murder indictments against two of the defendants clearly on video participating in the brutal savage slaughter of my son. john: this busy monday, hearing correctly from new york city crime victims as they wrap up investigations into alvin bragg of dereliction of duty. sandra, the band is back together again. sandra: fiery field hearing wrapping up moments ago a block away from bragg s of
as they say on the market shows, worry some. but on a more fundamental level there are also danger signs. when young people are told by their leaders that work is a scam, and that stealing things from other people is a human right, how do you think your economy s going to look in 10 years? how about your civilization? the answer depends in part on how much idleness and theft you put up with. any society that cannot declare unequivalently and with confidence that stealing is wrong has no future. when you let the mob loot, you are doomed. this is why we used to shoot looters. not because we hated them, it wasn t personal. but in order to defend the foundation of all that we have which is private property secured by law. without that, we would be living in savagery and chaos. in chicago, they already are. this is what america s second largest city looked like this weekend. [screaming and yelling]. oh, my god! tucker: there s no point to that. nobody s benning. what you re se
but ey economirec indicators or as they say in the market shows worrisome. but on a more fundamentalsi level, there are alsgno dangersl signs when young people are told by their leaders that workn is a scam and that stealingo yo things from other people is a human right. how do you think your economy is going to look in 10 years? how about your civilization ? the answer depends in part on just how much idlenesstheft and theft you put up with anypu society that cannot declarupe unequivocally and with confidence that stealing uneqlently and with confidence that steali ng ihas no future. l when you let the mob loot, youse are doomed.ho this is whoty we used to shoots. looters, not because we hated them. it wasn t personal, but inthat order to defend the foundation of all that we have, which. is private property secured by the lawthat, without that we would be living in savageryd ch and chaos in chicago.is they already are. this is what america s second largest city looked li
intervene. sandra: you see how absolutely brutal and scary that was, and new concerns over crime and disorder, not just in chicago, but across america. so, how can leaders prevent the culture of lawlessness from overtaking these once great cities? we ll good giano caldwell, he says soft on crime policies are to blame and will join us live what we are learning out of chicago and coast to coast crime on the rise. begin, though, with the fiery hearing from the house oversight committee hearing, disastrous withdrawal from afghanistan. good wednesday to you, sandra. sandra: about halfway there, sandra smith in new york. hearing comes two weeks after the biden administration released the report blaming the shocking collapse of the afghan government on the trump administration. john: a group of inspectors general who wrote a separate report says president biden deserves a large amount of the blame for his exit strategy, removed american resources supporting the afghan govern
details the potential offenses being investigated. you can see there, it says willful retention of national defense information, also concealment or removal of government records. also obstruction of a federal investigation. that willful retention that you see there, anderson, it s key because legal experts are telling our evan perez and caitlin polantz that it s that language that points directly to the former president as a possible subject of the criminal probe. something else that was released was the motion to seal, and it has federal prosecutors expressing their concern that, as you can see there, evidence might be destroyed. and, you know anderson, that could explain why fbi agents were really compelled to move in and spent hours taking, you know, 11 steps of classified documents in the end. could you just explain what the doj s main argument against releasing the affidavit is? yeah, they ve been arguing this in their papers, they also argued it forcefully in court