party, politicizing it, fine, but everyone, his own intelligence people, everyone is on the same page as the russians were crewing around in the election. not that it altered the results. most people say he won fairly, squarely, got the vote in the battleground states that changed the equation, but he wouldn t even go there. i find that worrisome. it is more than worrisome. i watched that press conference. the bore was low for what a lot of us expected donald trump to say about the meddling. what he actually did say, neil, was so appalling. when you re asked as president if you believe the intelligence community or vladimir putin, that is not a hard question. he s managed to unit republicans and democrats back here in washington in their condemnation of what he said today. and i think the substance of
of this country. it wasn t just democrats getting upset. republicans speaking out about this. this was the theme from chuck schumer. take a look. he should have marched in, put the indictment on the table and demanded justice. he took the world of the kgb over the men and women of the cia. neil: all right. we re going to be rifling through a lot of the republicans that had problems with this, including senator john mccain and orrin hatch and paul ryan. they all said the russians interfered with the election. we don t think it will change the outcome or altered the final results that had you declared the electoral vote winner, but the russians were involved and had the capability to be involved and you should do something about it and say something about it. we re all over it with john roberts in helsinki, finland and
mcmaster. my point is the president thinks these aren t a lot. if you use history as a benchmark, it is much more than any other president had at this same point in his administration in history. yeah. i mean, look, of course the line from the white house and the president is going to be like, oh, this is normal, nothing to see here. but it is incredibly chaotic. you don t usually have this much a deluge all at once. the president keeps hinting may be thinking of threat epping to get rid of other people. shulkin. carson has exposure with the dining room table. zinke had certain trips called into question. jeff sessions, rod rosenstein. there could be several others at any point. that is what contributes to this feel of in stability in and around the white house.
the jihadis have made it clear, al qaeda and their magazine inspire, isis in their publication, go to places where there are large amounts of infidels who cannot protect themselves. tourist attractions, christmas markets. we saw this before in nice. this is the reality where there are a lot of people, a lot of civilians who cannot look after themselves that will be a target. meaning it s a soft target, aren t a lot of defense, not a lot of barriers or armed guards. is this a whole new world for if us? the fact is the dangerous reality is that isis has learned from the mistakes of al qaeda. al qaeda was ironically too successful on september 11th. they killed 3,000 people in 102 minutes. afterwards they were obsessed with weapons of massive
who who can t afford full-time college. are thaw proposing anything else, the republicans? marco rubio proposed accreditation form for people who would do much better in vocational programs. he would allow more programs like that to address. that doesn t address that most students want to go to a good four-year college. this aren t a lot after real republican alternatives to that yet and i think they should come up with some. they have to engage on this if they want to win. otherwise they re in trouble. there is a advantage here. big picture. i don t think what every kid dreams about is getting highly indebted and running away from the debt because they can t find a job later to finance it. i think to the extent that they talk about how do we get some payoff for that education. how do we get the economic moving, that may be a stronger argument.