a few columns basically same color blind if you re simply looking at the action, however, he does not help his own cause think that beto is saying that when it turns out that every rump is responsible for this. single one of these people is that s just unsane, obviously trump doesn t want to see all either african american or the people murdered, nobody wants to see somebody like this, these are craze lunatics. brown, had some type of color to their skin and therefore it gives people an easier path twie say in pathway he takes on i would call it domestic terrorist and white supremacist terrorism, antiimmigrant terrorism but to blame president trump, that s just it s i logical in addition to being black or brown people. unfair. the president issued statement calling this a hateful act and act of cowardliness and al sharpton has history of what some call record ambulance. at the same time i have a sense of dejav, during obama administration when police officers were killed, light
about the way that we live and happen. we will see if the president what s allowed in different responds to that in the latest developments when he heads back to washington later today, platforms and servers that they have than anything that congress howie. can do to change the laws in thanks very much for the update, minutes before the mass different respects, is it shooting in el paso, a manifesto appeared online that attacked possibility, silicon valley in a hispanics and immigrants, sense to say certain things that you re not going you will authorities are work to go have to build your own server to confirm whether the gunman is, in fact, the make this thing happen as oppose to allowing this stuff to joining in new york kat tempf, kathy, publisher of catalina and foment, everyone in favor washington post editor. shutting there s places. kathy, the new york post has certainly worth debating. antiimmigrant terrorist. america victim being of white now inside the story says we
this is an administration, dana, that is extremist antiimmigrant. it is broadened people from some of the most nefarious antiimmigrant groups in the country to run agencies and but david right now the law is the law. certainly the executive branch has a some leeway, but they are supposed to process, as you mentioned, the asylum requests in a way that has been approved in a bipartisan way in the past. that s exactly right, which is why it s shocking when the president as you pointed out brought a public made public statements in his twitter account over and over about disparaging these people, that he was angry that they were coming, trying to shine light on this caravan and trying to make it more difficult, calling for mexico to break up this caravan. to me that s a violation of our international protocols. we are supposed to be considering, as you just pointed out, we are supposed to be considering as a nation,
someone, our immigration system is not set up to allow for that. for example, if you have a relative coming from mexico and you want to legally sponsor them, it can take 20-plus years. maybe we need to change the law. that s why we need reform. but the trump administration has anti-sponsorship, so that in fact would be against what the trump administration is trying to put out there. exactly. this is a mind, mind you where four of his five children are children of an immigrant, so let s remember that. this is the most antiimmigrant person we have seen, but four of his five children but he won on his wall. people rallied around that idea. here s the thing, we obvious put it on republicans, but there s a lot of democrats, especially in some of the sunbelt states where they re
dem laws don t allow them to do their jobs. act now congress. our country is being stolen. your response. it s unclear to know what exactly the president is talking about. it s a pretty unhinged tweet. daca is something we should take care of. we have bipartisan legislation that we could pass today if we were brought back into session or next week when we re there that would pass the dream act. we provided additional resources for border security in the omnibus bill so it s unclear what the president is talking about other than maybe appealing to his base by fermenting this sort of antiimmigrant language, but daca, of course, doesn t apply to anybody who s coming over the border today as his tweet suggests. this is a program where you have to have been in the united states as of 2007 and there are no new applications for dreamers being accepted. it s unclear what the president is talking about. we need comprehensive immigration reform. there s bipartisan support for that. the preside