pressure arizona governor juicy to overturn the presidential election results. saying that if enough fraudulent votes could be found, it would overcome trump s narrow loss in arizona. we are learning about the content of this conversation for the first time. to already know trump and doocy spoke after the 2020 election. fact. trump tried to call doocy while he was certifying the election for biden on official government livestream. on november 20th, 30 30 2020, d.c. was signing papers to end the election as he did in front of the press. you have to listen closely, you can hear hail to chief as he reaches into the pocket to silence the call. the ring town is spectacular. do you see did eventually speak to trump, didn t recorded the call. we have some idea what it might sound like because trump, we ll, made a lot of calls in multiple states. trying to overturn the results of this election. for example, here s a recording of trump calling georgia s then chief investigator from
election, we re still uncovering more attempts by donald trump to overturn results. according to a new report in the washington post, president trump tried to pressure doug ducey to overturn the election results, saying if now fraudulent votes could be found, it could overcome trump s narrow loss in arizona. we re learning about the content of this conversation for the first time. we already knew trump and ducey spoke after the 2020 election. trump tried to call ducey while he was certifying the election for biden on an official government live stream. on 2020, ducey was literally signing the papers to end the election, seated in front of the press. but you have to listen carefully. you can make out hail to the chief as ducey reaches into his pocket to silence the call. the ring tone is just spectacular. ducey did eventually speak to trump. did not record the call. but we have some idea what it might sound like because trump made a lot of calls in multiple states, tryi
the thing i noticed when i look at the people who are clearing this bar is there is no policy difference with trump. that s but they all renamed themselves in this image that s the thing in the party. like, you can have people like chris christie who want to do what trump wants to do in a different way. but what they want to do is the same. all the people on that stage are gonna be anti-gay, anti-women, anti-schools, anti-education, anti-black, anti hispanic. that s their party. that is from the top to the bottom, right? and so, all they are debating about really is style. like, do you want the guy who tells, give people or do you want the guy who says, i don t like you today. like, that is the debate. i take the point that elie makes, michelle, that a lot of this will end up being and perhaps none of it will actually move the needle when it came to republican primary voters. i think we all agree that we are not entirely sure what would move the needle with
politically still in the game. in a different world, mike pence should easily clear the standards to be on that debate stage. if only trump didn t try to kill him, maybe mike pence would be more popular in that party. the thing i notice when i look at the list of people who are clearing this ridiculous bar is there s no policy difference with trump. like, and that s they have all remade themselves in his image. that s the thing with their party at this point. you can have some people like chris christie who want to do what trump wants to do in a different way. but what they want to do is the same. all the people on that stage are going to be anti-gay, anti-women, anti-schools, anti-black, anti-party. all they re debating about really is style. do you want the guy who tells gay people i hate you, or do you want the guy who says i just don t like you today? that s the debate.