That could be affected by behavior in my units this legislation does not peers the vail of the existing leases or the agreements already in place a huge thing from my constituents i have a lot of people that are home sharers and not around the enforcement so if theres an issue or complaint if someone is looking at this we dont leave to the nuisance laws and quite frankly people dont have their faith so permitting this behavior our Planning Department is on board i know theyre to work on this is incredibly important and supervisor wiener thanksgiving thanks to him Going Forward with a mechanism that will go along with that i like like supervisor breed have two minor amendments right now i know theres a lot of discussion around private right of action in the current form of the lvenlths theres a limited scope to some of the ideas ive heard flooded around with that a Interested Party on page 12 id like to include in that definition a Building Owner and also to clarify that the homeowners
Core and central thats a no brainer and insurance for anyone that could be affected by behavior in my units this legislation does not peers the vail of the existing leases or the agreements already in place a huge thing from my constituents i have a lot of people that are home sharers and not around the enforcement so if theres an issue or complaint if someone is looking at this we dont leave to the nuisance laws and quite frankly people dont have their faith so permitting this behavior our Planning Department is on board i know theyre to work on this is incredibly important and supervisor wiener thanksgiving thanks to him Going Forward with a mechanism that will go along with that i like like supervisor breed have two minor amendments right now i know theres a lot of discussion around private right of action in the current form of the lvenlths theres a limited scope to some of the ideas ive heard flooded around with that a Interested Party on page 12 id like to include in that definit
Legislation i see stationss t is core and central thats no brainer and insurance for anyone that could be affected by behavior in my units this legislation does not peers the vail of the existing leases or the agreements already in place a huge thing from my constituents i have a lot of people that are home sharers and not around the enforcement so if theres an issue or complaint if someone is looking at this we dont leave to the nuisance laws and quite frankly people dont have their faith so permitting this behavior our Planning Department is on board i know theyre to work on this is incredibly important and supervisor wiener thanksgiving thanks to him Going Forward with a mechanism that will go along with that i like like supervisor breed have two minor amendments right now i know theres a lot of discussion around private right of action in the current form of the lvenlths theres a limited scope to some of the ideas ive heard flooded around with that a Interested Party on page 12 id
Practice unfortunately, there was a measure i had and many had issues we know the legislation process for the democratic feedback to incorporate the publics feedback and our feedback to make amendments to address the future issues new developments that come up we can address those as well and one thing ill mention two other changes is to require every year the Planning Department and Planning Commission to analyze our suggestions and as well as to insure that the Planning Department has enough resources to adequately and proactive enforce the rules they need to enforce let me close with the following i want to thank for sharing our ideas about home sharing theres been a significant difference in prospective i tried to balance the perspectives in a reasonable solution with the underlying goal of addressing our foonlt crisis and colleagues lets take action today, its on a two year conversation its been at the board of supervisors for over 6 months and numerous public discussion and input
Not Community Needs i dont want a freeforall that turns houses in San Francisco into hotels and leaves the permanent resident out in the cosponsored cold nor earning extra money were sailing into unchartered waters we need a balance to provide housing for permanent residents all in all this legislation strikes a balance that is a good balance i have to emphasize this is very easily in the game honestly we dont know how this industry or legislation will play out in every circumstances in every neighborhood we dont know if the city needs to put a cap on the shortterm rentals in the future or if 90 or nine hundred and 65 or one hundred and 20 days is navigate the right limit for rental per night as we grapple with the Affordable Housing like few cities have seen not many issues as desire as the protection and supply of our housing figure and when we passe this legislation ill watch this issue i want to see how effectively the Planning Department can enforce the rules and the hosts come fo