job. we re going to send the president the key stein pipe lynn xl bill. it will be supported by a number of democrats. how about that? if you re an extreme supporter of doing something about climate change and you re against the pipeline you re an extreme supporter, that s what you are. some have broken ranks. senate democrats are becoming more vocal, and i don t know why. are they buys the sell job? here as minnesota senator amy clo close abu char. i think the bigger issue i have always voted for allow the process to continue. to allow the president to make a decision. but i m getting have you
frustrated with t i don t want you ll see a lot of vote switching. senator, are you frustrated that the republicans won t come to the table with a jobs bill? are you from us traited with the record number of filibusters that the republican senate has down and probably more of that on the way. senator clobuchar is from minnesota. she knows whether it s 15 below zero, it s damn cold out. there are absolutes to this project. what has merit? explain to me all the merit. is there merit to line the koch brothers pockets some more? is it merit that it s not going to affect any americans paying at the pump? is it merit that all of a sudden that keystone isn t going to do anything to climate change? where is the merit here. clobuchar is playing both sides of the issue, because she doesn t want to be a targets of special interests. punting keystone over to the president is an easy solution
and get that done. instead they pick this issue that threatens our environment. senator how can the republicans be so excited about 42 thousands temporary jobs yet hardly say about the addition of 57 months of private sector growth. last month was pretty good over 200,000 jobs. we can t get a word out of them. the jobs as president obama pointed out are cribbs shun jobs. once it s constructed there s very few permanent jobs crated by this pipeline. the oil does not go to the united states. it s basically canadian oil, the dirtiest oil, going into the international marketplace. we have record-low gasoline prices today, so certainly not needed from the point of roof of our economic issues so this bill makes very, very sense. i don t know how you can have an amendment that would dictate that canadian oil would stay to the benefit of american consumers and it couldn t go
for any senator who might be in a tough spot and be concerned about whether they ll be politically targeted or not. there are absolutes. you either want to do something about climate change or you don t. in the xl project it s the worst decision that democrats or any representative could make when it comes to building something that will bring in kind of oil to market that is unnecessary. detroit lakes, minnesota, i bought gas for 1.99 a glean. senator, that s your state. she says congress should have no business in deciding where the pipeline is located. really? we should let any foreign country do what they said? remember, this is canadian oil being pumped to the middle of the country to the gulf where it would be sold overseas. it will not affect you at the gas pump. flowing over the acwe fur putting the drinking water and crops in danger.