have to accept that this will not be over. before the presidential election, which is what, i think, many people had hoped, no matter who s side you are on, the voters would have some kind of resolution in this case before they had to make their final vote. and i don t think we re gonna get that anymore. i think she s actually right on that point, and it s going to be interesting because of the fact that florida has the rocket docket. i ve been talking about this. it s not something that has existed in every federal jurisdiction, but doesn t florida. typically the rocket docket is a system where judges are much more aggressive around their counter, trying to move their dockets. in most cases the judge may put a case over for trial for a year, and allow the discovery process to take place that may stop the cloth clock and move things forward. in florida and other jurisdictions that have a rocket docket, it s more like six months. what will be interesting is, from a legal strategy, i e
election season as possible. if you have a friendly judge, that is going to provide her some coverage to say well, if he s already running the narrative that this is an election interference, so the closer that we get in the deeper we get into 2024, the more it validates that, and so it s gonna be interesting to see how, with a rocket docket, but a friendly judge, where did he sings converge? we ll take a quick break. a special edition of the 11th hour, just getting underway on a friday night. a friday night ke.? .everyday products. .designed smarter. like a smart coffee grinder - that orders fresh beans for you. oh, genius! for more breakthroughs like that. .i need a breakthrough card. like ours! with 2.5% cash back on purchases of $5,000 or more. plus unlimited 2% cash back on all other purchases! and with greater spending potential, sam can keep making smart ideas. .a brilliant reality! the ink business premier card from chase for business. make more of what s yours.
this is something we saw the special counsel do, and the previous special counsel, robert, mueller was unwilling to do. jack smith is willing to go to court and fight to have lawyers who worked for donald trump testify and he pierced nauta attorney client privilege because he thought he could prove before a judge that there were some way in which the lawyers themselves might have been, might have been being can -induced or coerced to participate in a crime. so that s one of the reasons we have so much incredible information. including conversations that normally would not see between a lawyer and their client, questions like, well, what if we just don t comply, what if we just don t do what they say. i m sure that those conversations have happened before between people being accused of a crime in their lawyers. it just normally they don t show up in an indictment because we are protected. but because what don trump did seemed on its face so much like trying to coerce an attorney into
judges participate in that. how deep does the judge want to go to trying to figure out if a juror can actually be impartial? something like that you re just not gonna read about necessarily, but really matters or deciding what arguments can be put in front of the jury, like can he make the arguments about i declassified, it orthotic last divided, that whole basket of arguments that have been floating in the press. i think those are not really serious enough to get in front of a jury, but she could put them in for tory. could she keep running the clock? that s the thing. the biggest thing she has control over, her power is timing. she can make decision after decision. if he comes in and he says i have to be somewhere because i m running for president, or i have another case that i have to deal with, and how she sort of reacts to that, i think it is possible now that we really
before our eyes. so lying to us about this is is just a waste of time. but now having said that it gets to the point, i think one of the aspects of this that i m really interested in watching, and that is the jury process. i don t trust judge cannon as far as i can to answer. she has already shown or bias, her particularity for trump. now even with the smack on the hand pretty severe smack on the hand by the 11th circuit, i still believe there s more personally that she can play. so that s part one of what to watch. and part two is how this jury comes together. all you need is one to say no. if that one decides, somehow gets through the cracks, pretending they re going to be objective, pretending they re going to observe the facts and apply the law to the facts, and