it apart? well, apparently they don t have the document, so we don t know what that document really was. we know what we think it was, but apparently the government doesn t have it. so that might eat away at their ability to make hay with that particular document. it does seem to blow up the argument that one way or another i declassified, and in this case he said he didn t or he said he could have but now he can t. so that pretty much settles that. so, that s certainly a strong piece of evidence. i think, and it s caught the eye of a lot of observers who wondered how strong the evidence would be. this tape recording comes in at trial and stands up, it seems to me that is a big point in the government s favor. sandra: brit, another update from the white house press briefing where jacqui heinrich was able to get a question in with karine jean-pierre asking about the recorded conversations with the president and his son hunter biden and burisma, she
judges participate in that. how deep does the judge want to go to trying to figure out if a juror can actually be impartial? something like that you re just not gonna read about necessarily, but really matters or deciding what arguments can be put in front of the jury, like can he make the arguments about i declassified, it orthotic last divided, that whole basket of arguments that have been floating in the press. i think those are not really serious enough to get in front of a jury, but she could put them in for tory. could she keep running the clock? that s the thing. the biggest thing she has control over, her power is timing. she can make decision after decision. if he comes in and he says i have to be somewhere because i m running for president, or i have another case that i have to deal with, and how she sort of reacts to that, i think it is possible now that we really
of intent. what was he going to do with these? he s not posting them online but one of the really important things about the reporting, it gives us the first indication of what on earth was he doing with these documents and what is he doing in this scenario? he s trying to persuade some journalists to spin things his way for political advantage by sort of flaunting, i have this classified information. that s not as bad as selling information to a foreign adversary but that s still a bad intent and that s a big difference. is it against the law? yeah, i mean the argument prosecutors will make, look, there s going to be an argument but the prosecutors are going to argue he had knowledge and had intent and the classification issue goes to intent. look, there s just no squaring his statements with this what s on that tape. he has said many times over including on our air at cnn, i declassified, i declassified. in this recording he s saying this is classified after he s left office so y
have here back i have to get in a question about the origins - have here back i have to get in a question about the origins of. have here back i have to get in a i question about the origins of covid, president biden signed into law earlier this week having all the information related to the wuhan laboratory to be declassified, and for the origins of covid to be made more clear. when that data is declassified, do you think that will clear up what happened? i declassified, do you think that will clear up what happened?- declassified, do you think that will clear up what happened? i think this information will clear up what happened? i think this information will be clear up what happened? i think this information will be critical clear up what happened? i think this information will be critical for- information will be critical for people information will be critical for people to have an additional understanding of what was happening in wuhanm understanding of what was happen
and moreover, as defenses have changed from and you indicated this in your opening, that they were planted, to a i declassified everything, to they are my personal records. so even if there was a pollyannaish defense, he has destroyed it with his own changing of stories. i think he is going to say his defense to what he said today and that truth social post is no, again i do everything transparently and openly, of course it wouldn t be anything i had any knowledge of what that was unlawful, otherwise why would not be trusted transparent. but at some point that just doesn t hold up anymore. kellyanne conway testified to the january 6th committee today. let s listen to what the question she answered for more of a reporter for a few seconds after the testimony. did you plead the fifth? why did you choose to come here? today because i was asked to. but you said you came here