because they ruled in ways you don t like. when in the case where there is something truly outrageous, which took place here, then lawyers can into make these motions. it remains to be seen whether she stays with the case. and she does, special counsel will have to be ready for her at every step of the case. okay, but tali, should, or would ve, could ve, the end of the day of judge cannon s call, is it not whether or not she recuse herself? it s her call whether she recuse. is it 11 circuits recall whether they resign. i don t think either of those things that was going to happen. i think she s going to be the judge presiding on this case. . and how much of a glow is that to jack smith? could she just knock out huge portions of evidence? it s a couple of things. i think it really does matter who the judges. first, there are just the low visibility that decisions that judges are making all the time that have an enormous cumulative effect. i ll give you a couple of examples. in
Transcripts for MSNBC Dateline 20240604 07:46:30 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
and it will be judge cannon who oversees trump s arraignment next tuesday afternoon, and determines whether to set a trial date before the 2024 election. i am joined again by my esteemed colleagues, stephanie ruhle, andrew weissmann, and i want to welcome to the desk the great nbc senior legal correspondent laura jarrett. laura and, andrew this questions especially for you, laura. but aileen can, and controversial figure in judicial circles and media circles, and just casual onlookers. how did she get assigned this case? and truly, how much power does she have at this moment to derail it? to hear it from the public information officer down the, this is supposed to be around him assignment. despite the fact that she does has some past history with this case, there is not some related case doctrine that was a civil case, this is a criminal case. this was random. there is some issue about exactly what the pool of judges might be? i know there s some reporting out there that suggested
not a small thing to be able to pierce that privilege. in order to do that, they have to show that the advice was used to for the crime, and we now understand much better than i think we did even before, there was so much great reporting. obviously, trump s attorneys want to keep that out. that is very damning evidence, and they will file motions to try to exclude it, and on those motions will go to judge cannon. and so she takes out all of the notes that he transcribed in this narrative for him, and he was clearly disturbed by some of his interactions with his current client. let s make it clear, he is still a client. he may not be a client on this matter, but he is at least, as far as we last checked, still representing him as it relates to january 6th. and andrew weissmann, you pointed out. will he be a lawyer for donald trump longer than are ripe peach can sit on a grocery store shelf? to borrow a metaphor. you know, it seems like there could be an appeals process involving judge
Transcripts for MSNBC Dateline 20240604 07:56:15 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.