i mean in the case of trump personally, yes, there is a justice department t policy tha says no indictment can be sitting gainst a president, but were it not for that policy would trump have faced charges for this crime? how could it be that michael cohen did and trump didn t? if the only reason they didn t charge trump wasy because of t justice department role that precludes indicting a sitting president, prosecutors certainlp could have said so. they could haveai said that tha was the only reason he was being charged, that would have led to thech expectation and probably e eeventuality those charges would be basically put on hold during his presidency and would come in force with him stepping down from office. the prosecutors in this case did nothing like this. they pursued no charges against trump. instead they told the court this other guy committed the crime with trump and for trump and at
against a , quote, rush to judgment and wants him to receive psychiatric attention while he awaits trial. i m actually strohmier now back to the anger angle. the brand new movie father stew about boxer turned priestbo starring mark wahlberg and mel gibson has justt hit theaters for holy week. our own raymond arroyo sat down with the stars for an exclusiveh interview along with director roslyn ross. now gibson wahlberg explained how their own friendship shaped the film and they weigh in on a surprising hollywood fashion trend. t two of our interview mel. i know mark told me last time when he was getting into this process of investing his own cash intoo a passion project he called the maestro of this kind of deal . what did you advise him at the time? i said be careful, but hey, it s a good idea.a. it could go anyway. there s no there s no
0 this evening. as always, thank you for beingel with you. op makee this show possible. we hope you ll say a dvr so you never miss an episode. i ll be out tomorrow. tammyut bruce will be and i hope you have a great passover and a great easter and never let your heart be troubled. thanks for being with us. er good evening, everyone.th i m laura ingraham and this is the ingraham angle. h tonight we bring you part two of our exclusive with mel gibson and mark wahlberg. you ll hear why they ve turned to making family themedily mov. plus their thoughts on a new trend among some men in hollywood. you don t want to miss it. but first, dems don t t care. that s the focus of tonight s angle. it almost seems vindictive at this point. now a a i m talking about what the party in power isn t inflicting on the united states runaway inflation, devastating family budgets now crime waves terrorizing our cities. the fentanyl explosion killing thousands of americans every month. millions of illegal
interviewed by police as last week after a womaning a accused her of groping her breasts and putting his hand up a skirt during a meeting. and then the new york post went after the italian model with the story saying she accepted tickets to attend a show and she once filed a suit against a, quote, sugar daddy. her camp striking back in the daily news saying she s not afraid of harvey. joining us now from new york, amy holmes. big spread in the daily post. does the new york post in your view trash the italian model on harvey weinstein s behalf? i think there is no doubt that the new york post has been running with the story of attacking the accuser, oh, and bhi by the way, exploiting those photos of her for their own gain. it seems to be saying look at this lying hussy.
interviewed by police as last week after a womaning a accused her of groping her breasts and putting his hand up a skirt during a meeting. and then the new york post went after the italian model with the story saying she accepted tickets to attend a show and she once filed a suit against a, quote, sugar daddy. her camp striking back in the daily news saying she s not afraid of harvey. joining us now from new york, amy holmes. big spread in the daily post. does the new york post in your view trash the italian model on harvey weinstein s behalf? i think there is no doubt that the new york post has been running with the story of attacking the accuser, oh, and bhi by the way, exploiting those photos of her for their own gain. it seems to be saying look at this lying hussy.