involving everything from military strikes to cyber attacks. so why hasn t it happened yet? . and we re learning more about a potential israeli hostage deal just one day after the families of american hostages brought their questions and concerns to the white house. i ll talk to one of the women who was there about the possibility of a new deal and what the u.s. is doing to force the issue. but i want to begin with that contentious hearing on capitol hill, demanding answers from the ceos of the world s biggest social media companies, focusing largely on child sexual exploitation on their platforms. the heads of facebook and instagram, snap, tiktok, discord and x, formerly known as twitter, facing intense pressure from senators on both sides of the aisle. when a boeing plane lost a door in mid flight several weeks ago, nobody questioned the decision to ground a fleet of over 700 planes. so why aren t we taking the same type of decisive action on the danger of these platfo
We are not going to move a car office lot today. Exactly. But it is something you might be willing to consider. It brings us full circle to the beginning of the panel with joel pointing out we might get rid of stuff under the aup but we are not messing with the feed. One might wonder, could that amount to a commitment of some kind in the future or not . Obviously, we are not going to move a car office lot today. Those might be interesting to think about to bridge the gap alex is invoking. Even though yelp and other companies would not do it, they would argue in court for the right to do it because they have First Amendment rights. That is the way they are interpreting them. That is going to be a real issue. Why not establish a reputational stake in something . I dont know if google regrets it, dont be evil. That is a way of saying come at us if we let you down. Google has ways of looking at this issue. The right to do what you want to with the data you collect is an interesting questio
That is true. A lot of the search costs for finding things have been obliterated. It used to be you could find a criminal record in the basement of city hall. The internet has obliterated that. People are concerned about the impact. What concerns me about the right to be forgotten is it has not been balanced with some of the other competing values such as the values of Free Expression and the benefit of the consumers right to know about things like whether a vendor has had bad reviews against them or a babysitter has had criminal offenses. These are things that people could request to be removed from search results and i think thats very anticonsumerist. Is this a shift in thinking with google from a stance that used to say we index the internet. If you have a problem with that, please consult the internet. To a stance that says, there are a lot of tricky things that need to be balanced and may have quibbles with a privately activated process where a person comes to google and maybe a
Department, which is where we are right now. There is no compromise . When Congress Comes back into town, they will have to decide how to break this impasse. The president has said that he will veto an appropriations bill that comes to his desk that defense our executive actions. I believe that is the right position. He shouldnt tie one to the other. The litigation plays a fact or im sure. We have said we will appeal. That will play itself out. We need to break this impasse it im hoping he will be able to figure out a way to do that. Thank you. Thank you. This is a timely subject. I appreciate that we are discussing Cyber Security. That ought to be we are partly it is the state working for federal government and certainly engaging in the. In our state, we have millions of hits a day hackers tend break into our state. It is a new frontier for crime. I appreciate being here with you today to discuss this issue. I do not want to belabor the point. It has been said that it is important. Th
Tells them that someone is in the rim and that is more efficient. If you look at it over uber, this is taking capital that was being underutilized and employing it in a more productive way. Anyway you have capital that is underutilized, anywhere that there is a large labor of whole that is not using capital these are areas that will be disrupted in the next 10 years. The second question, i do not have any signs or evidence for this, but i have toys been very optimistic about the likely impact of future technology. The way i try to think about it, there are two possible outcomes. If you put this in star trek terms, you have the United Federation of planets where everybody cooperates and everyone has the ability to achieve personal enlightenment and personal best or you have the board, where everybody is nobody. It is one giant collective. These are two very different futures that come from the same set of technologies. I have boys imagined it would be like the federation and less like t