no group be they gays, be they namla, be they people who believe in bestiality, it doesn t matter what they are, they don t get to change the definition. it s not something that s against gays. he said nambla. republicans aren t doing themselves any favors. alexander burns writes in politico, that on marriage equality, the republican party has positioned itself at odds with young, educated and politically independent voters and he argues, the only obvious way to square that political circle in the short-term is by a sweeping supreme court decision. until the issue is settled once and for all, conservative intolerance will dominate the discussion and continue to alienate people from their party. aside from the fact we re talking about namla and people who want to marry animals, would it be better for the republican