57% say it s time for someone new. that could not be more clear. those numbers have to change dramatically and quickly for donald trump to have a reasonable chance to win the next election. and there is nothing on the political horizon that likely to improve those numbers. donald trump ran for president claiming he would revive manufacturing in america when manufacturing was already doing reasonably well. today the washington post reports that thanks to donald trump s trade war, that he is losing. the u.s. manufacturing purchases index fell to 49.9 in august from 50.4 in july. that is the first time that that particular closely watched indicator has fallen below 50 since the first year of the obama presidency. american automobile manufacturers have overruled donald trump s misguided softening of emission standards for their fleets and have made a deal with the state of california for stricter regulation than the trump administration wants nationally. the state of california is, of
a revision. and if you have a turn in the economy, it may not indicate a recession, but it may indicate an inflexion point in terms of the growth that we are experiencing. that s when you get a big revision of this kind. let s talk about these inflexion points. the data that guys like you and me look at that do not a recession make or not a strong economy make, they re kind of there and you have to take them into stock. august we had manufacturing purchasing managers index it s called. it s some sense of what manufacturing purchasing managers buy. the index was at 49.9 in august. it was down from 50.4 in july. 50 is considered neutral on this measure. this is just an initial reading for august. we don t know how it ll be revived. but when you look at things like that, what do you tell people who ask you, john, are we going to have a recession, are we not? i don t think it s determinative of whether or not we re going to have a recession.
2019. prize money $30 million, the winning team gets to divide just $4 million. the women s salaries are less than the men because they generate much less revenue. it s simple. supply and demand as a concept isn t sexist, it s just reality. where the women should be getting paid more than the men is through the u.s. soccer federation. this is a national soccer league. the women generated almost a million more in revenue for the federation than the men. revenue for the u.s. soccer federation for the women s team $50.8 million, the men, $49.9. the women need to renegotiate their contract. so i don t want women and men paid equally.
million between them. 2019. prize money $30 million, the winning team gets to divide just $4 million. the women s salaries are less than the men because they generate much less revenue. it s simple. supply and demand as a concept isn t sexist, it s just reality. where the women should be getting paid more than the men is through the u.s. soccer federation. this is a national soccer league. the women generated almost a million more in revenue for the federation than the men. revenue for the u.s. soccer federation for the women s team $50.8 million, the men, $49.9. the women need to renegotiate their contract. so i don t want women and men paid equally.
million between them. 2019. prize money $30 million, the winning team gets to divide just $4 million. the women s salaries are less than the men because they generate much less revenue. it s simple. supply and demand as a concept isn t sexist, it s just reality. where the women should be getting paid more than the men is through the u.s. soccer federation. this is a national soccer league. the women generated almost a million more in revenue for the federation than the men. revenue for the u.s. soccer federation for the women s team $50.8 million, the men, $49.9. the women need to renegotiate their contract. so i don t want women and men paid equally.