Unprecedented step further in what critics call an effort to is distract the white house now threatening to revoke security clearance from six former Top National Security officials, all of whom are fierce critics of trumps actions or inactions. These officials have served both democrats and republicans and have decades of experience in intelligence, law or diplomacy. For context, the heads of the Intelligence Agencies usually keep the Security Clearances unless theres reason to revoke them. It allows them mpay attentio to this it allows them to speak openly about matter the. They keep the clearance so if the Current Administration needs some advice or help, they can talk to them. I want to point out something. Sarah sanders was very proud to get up and change the topic because she didnt want to talk about the president s walkback, disaster in helsinki, all the
messes. Certainly didnt want to talk about migrant children. But the people she listed, so proud they want to revehicle the cl
sounds like a lot of money. well in 2019. we spent $799 billion on public a 12 education that is 0.3. of that entire budget, and it s a one time cost, and it s a proven lifesaver. ah, show me funding for getting a door locked and then we can talk. alright, well, john michael keyes. our heart goes out to you. i know. it probably doesn t get any easier as the day goes days. go on, but when you come out and give your perspective like this, i m sure it helps a lot of folks out there. so we appreciate your time very much. thank you. so much for joining us. jen, thanks for the opportunity. we appreciate it alright, still ahead. we still don t know what the charges will be for the now indicted former president donald trump. yet republicans already rallying to defend him. is that a smart way of going about things from a
most vulnerable. later we will ask you to give most vulnerable. later we will ask you to give to most vulnerable. later we will ask you to give to some most vulnerable. later we will ask you to give to some solutions - most vulnerable. later we will ask you to give to some solutions to i you to give to some solutions to that programme, but thank you for your thoughts just now. this morning, we re trying to work out when most people can expect to better off after years of hard times for many. in a second, we ll talk to michael gove. but one of the hard things is that the crystal ball is a bit dodgy when it comes to predicting what might happen. the office for budget responsibilty, set up in 2010, every six months tells governments and the rest of us how much the economy s likely to shrink or grown by their sums, so how much money the government s got to play with. it s important, they independently check the government s sums for us all, but the reality is, their forecasts often t
that balance right. the business case for the that balance right. the business case for the energy that balance right. the business case for the energy price - that balance right. the business - case for the energy price guarantee was that it costs seven 70 billion. it will only cost £a0 billion. it will only cost £a0 billion now. there is money you can deploy to make sure that bills don t go deploy to make sure that bills don t 9° up deploy to make sure that bills don t go up again. they are already suffering. i don t know why you don t give that clarity now? indie suffering. i don t know why you don t give that clarity now? we have civen don t give that clarity now? we have given people don t give that clarity now? we have given people clarity. don t give that clarity now? we have given people clarity. we don t give that clarity now? we have given people clarity. we are - don t give that clarity now? we have given people clarity. we are giving l given people clarity.
pete: this number is smaller. will: dropped by one billion dollars on this golden ticket for inflation reduction. $499 billion of it on climate, energy, health care spending and tax credits. pete: this is the inflation reduction act which won t reduce inflation and isn t about inflation. it s actually a gigantic climate scheme bill that is going to be paid for through corporate taxes, through 78,000 new irs employees, changes in drug prices, in fees, this is the green new deal, wrapped up in something supposed to address inflation of course will instead, you print too many golden tickets, will, do they lose value over time? will: i don t know. is it like printing money over and over? pete: how many golden tickets in willy wonka, were there five? will: i think there were five. pete: five but if you had 500 golden tickets it wouldn t be