Unprecedented step further in what critics call an effort to is distract the white house now threatening to revoke security clearance from six former Top National Security officials, all of whom are fierce critics of trumps actions or inactions. These officials have served both democrats and republicans and have decades of experience in intelligence, law or diplomacy. For context, the heads of the Intelligence Agencies usually keep the Security Clearances unless theres reason to revoke them. It allows them mpay attentio to this it allows them to speak openly about matter the. They keep the clearance so if the Current Administration needs some advice or help, they can talk to them. I want to point out something. Sarah sanders was very proud to get up and change the topic because she didnt want to talk about the president s walkback, disaster in helsinki, all the
messes. Certainly didnt want to talk about migrant children. But the people she listed, so proud they want to revehicle the cl
messes. certainly didn t want to talk about migrant children. but the people she listed, so proud they want to revehicle the clearanc revoke the clearance, two of them don t have clearance. if you want to pick a fight. do your homework. this is not actually a policy change. it would be one thing if you said everyone. i want to make that point again. it s one thing when you say rand paul. rand paul wanted a policy change. the president just picked a handful of people who he doesn t like and said we re talking your clearances, no the everybody. rand paul was making a recent argument. you ve got millions out there with clearance. they could make a mistake. maybe there should be a cooling off period. before they re working for private companies or speaking to the media. because what if president trump took that perverted it into here s six people who have smack talked me or gone after rush. let s pull their clearance. let s take a closer look.