sean: at the very latest on the growing backlash on senator warren s so-called dna test along with the continued of elements along with the disappearance of the journalist journalists, fox news washington correspondence. kristin fisher is watching both of these stories and this is getting very strange. i wonder if the president was lied to by the saudis, and in fact this journalist was khashoggi was in fact killed, and nobody knew at the top. it s hard to believe. there are so many questions about it and that s one of the reasons that mike pompeo is on his way to saudi arabia to try to figure out what first-hand exactly happened. that s one story we are watching tonight. the other one is, senator elizabeth warren who is receiving a lot of pushback from releasing those dna test results, at least to see some of those anywhere from 1/64-1/1004
1/64 to 1/thousand native-american. i will take a dna test. i ve been told my grandmother may part cherokee indian. it may be just talk. you will find out in couple weeks i will take the test. steve: you are going to take it. i will take it. results will be revealed here. this is my trump moment. this is reality tv. i m dying to know. i didn t really think much about it. but she is less than .1 of 1%. i think can beat her. brian: if you beat her will you ask for a million dollars from the president? i want a can even know and million bucks. steve: casino on the line. ainsley: pastor brunson from north carolina. came back. god less him. ainsley: what is your reaction. president did a great job. he should never been in jail. better days for turkey, saudi arabia, only way for better day, clean up the mess they created.
of which i m happy to have. i think it was a mistake and it gave president trump back his talking points and then we re going to have a couple news cycles based on it. ainsley: kayleigh, when i woke this up morning we are talking about senator warren s d.n.a. test whether or not she has 1/64th or 1/1,000th native american blood. i thought is this really a topic? it really is a distraction when the democrats need to be focused on the midterms and taking the house back if that s what they want, right? ainsley, that s right. we are three weeks from election day. to be talking about d.n.a. test, to have the cherokee community calling out a democrat three weeks before elections, to be talking about eliminating due process four weeks before elections, that s what we were talking about with kavanaugh, to be talking about eric holder kicking republicans, saying go out and kick them and mostly cloudy making really dumb wrong-headed statements in the wake of the me too movement. these are not
her? i mean, look, we re 24 hours out from it happening, so let s put that in as a caveat, but i would say looking at it today, yes. i don t think trump s response is any big secret. i wrote a piece today in which i said if it had come out that the dna test showed she was half native american, donald trump will still attack it as a phony dna test. that s who he is and what he does. that said, i think what elizabeth warren was trying to do was reassure democrats, say look, i know this is a thing that i didn t handle well in the 2012 senate campaign. i ll going to put it to rights now. you don t need to worry about me. if i m the nominee, he s not able to get me on this. i don t think that what we saw yesterday and the idea that she s between 1/64th and 1/1,024th native american, i don t think it does the trick. i think chuck coscon jr. is problematic for her, too, saying
nation or any tribal nation even vaguely is inappropriate and wrong. it makes a mockery out of dna tests and its legitimate uses while dishonoring legitimate tribal governments and their citizens who ancestors are well documented and whose heritage is proven. senator warren is undermining tribal interest with her continued claims of tribal heritage. that statement came amidst a day of twitter tirades from warren, first posting the boston globe story highlighting the dna test and firing dozens of attacks against the president. as for the article, the globe issued a correction to its math, downgrading her results to between 1/64th and 1/1,024th native american. the article noted the analysis was based not on native american dna but on mention peruvian mexican, peruvian and columbian dna. a study said the average