to any connection to the cherokee nation or any tribal nation is inappropriate and wrong. it makes a mockery out of dna tests and its legitimate uses while also dishonoring legitimate tribal governments and their citizens whose ancestors are well documented and heritage is proven. senator warren is undermining tribal interest with continued claims of tribal heritage. that statement came amidst a day of twitter tirades from warren, first posting the boston globe story highlightin highlighting . the globe had to issue a correction to its math, downgrading its results to between 1/64th and 1 /1,024th native american. the article noted the an an sill was baseanalysiswas based on cod
michael moore, that s not much better. in his hyperpartisan, anti-trump documentary, another flop at the box office. and guess what, to the disappointment of many detached coastal hollywood elites. meanwhile when they are not ramping up, and lying to you, the american people, nowhere is this more obvious than with massachusetts senator, pocahontas, as the president calls her, elizabeth warren. over the course of her career, she has repeatedly, and for long periods of time has identified themselves as a minority, teaching at the university of pennsylvania. she actually changed her ethnicity from white to native american. at harvard law school, she was h once described as the first woman of color. she published her own cookbook entitled powwow chow. she frequently touted her native american ancestry. today she published the results of the dna study and it turns out she s roughly 1/64-1/1024
coming out it said she is somewhere between 1/32 but that was all wrong. they are used to fake news but this time it was fake math. it was really only 1/64th. or up to 1/1024. as soon as i leave tonight i am playing the lottery. my number is 1024. the thing is, all the moon bats who love her have all posted the story saying that she is 1/32 and they didn t runng the corrections on the story. the fuzzy math. tucker: has anyone ever asked the obvious question which is who cares? if she had one genetic makeup does that make her a better person than if she has another? do we live in that country where you are judged by your dna? i have offered to pay for her dna test for many moons.
says she is native personal. the president said she is not. he has been calling her pocahontas. the results are in. steve: they are. keep in mind when we took our d.n.a. test we did it on television. she did it, noble knew she was doing it and she was working with a fellow from stanford who is well-regarded in this department name is carlos bruc.what he has narrowed down strongly suggests that six to ten generations ago she could have a native american ancestor. 1/64th native. or 1/1,024th. to make up for a lack of native american d.n.a. the expert used samples from mexico, peru, and colombia. so it wasn t necessarily native american. he used those nations to stand if nor it. so we don t know exactly for sure what she is.
circuit. he has replaced more judges than everybody of late. the president exaggerates when it comes to doing things, he is the most transparent. that s why he keeps walking over to the cameras. that s why you don t need sarah huckabee sanders. every stop that he makes he talks to the cameras first, he talks to the people. and then he talks again at the end. steve: at the white house sarah huckabee sanders just said waited, did he just say they don t need me? brian: why do i need a briefing the president is talking every day. ainsley: elizabeth warren has done a lot of talking about her lineage. she did do a d.n.a. test without anyone knowing. she says that the results prove that she is part of the cheer key nation. cheer cherokee nation. the president says no. this is actually back firing on her. steve: she worked with carlos from stanford. and apparently if you go back 6 to 10 generations ago, there is some native american an sells industry, 1/64th or 1/1,024th. here is the rub tho