narratives that you want. three weeks before an election as the generic ballot is tightening. i don t think the brett kavanaugh hearings were about a lack of due process. whether we hear from sexual assault survivors and whether they believe them when they give a very credible story. that s one thing. as far as d.n.a. tests it s not just about a d.n.a. test. it s about elizabeth warren feeling that she has been accused about lying and using her native american ancestry, 1/64th. 1/1,000th percentage point to get ahead there are a number of political professors made it perfectly clear she did not use her native american heritage to get her position and she someone of the greatest law professors we have had in the country and a number of harvard law students who would tell you the same thing. she put down she was a woman of color. that s insane. she used it at harvard. she used it all throughout her law career. are you saying that she got hired because of that, that she was not qual
and guess what, to the disappointment of many detached coastal hollywood elites. meanwhile when they are not ramping up, and lying to you, nowhere is this more obvious than with massachusetts senator, pocahontas as a president calls her, and for long periods of time has identified themselves as a minority, teaching at the university of pennsylvania. she actually changed her ethnicity from white to native american. at harvard law school, she was once described as the first woman of color. she published her own cookbook entitled, powwow child. today she published the results of the dna study and it turns out she s roughly 1/64-1/1024
that this morning with the story coming out it said she is somewhere between 1/32 but that was all wrong. they are used to fake news but this time it was fake math. it was really only 1/64th. as soon as i leave tonight i am playing the lottery. the thing is, all the moon bats who love her have all posted the story saying that she is 1/32 and they didn t run the corrections on the story. some fuzzy math. tucker: has anyone ever asked the obvious question which is who cares? if she had one genetic makeup is that make her a better person that if she has another? do we live in that country where you are judged by your dna? i been offered to pay for dna
i actually think he has something of a point here. elizabeth warren comes out with this five-plus minute video, clearly designed to put to rest, quiet, not necessarily his attacks on her, calling her pocahontas, but to say to democrats, number one, i m prepared for this. number two, i m ready to fight back. there is not going to be a swift voting of me like there was of john kerry. at the same time, the conclusion was by this stanford geneticist that is in the video, that it it s very, very probable, i m paraphrasing, that she does have some native american blood in her somewhere down the line to the point of 1/64th native american, all the way to 1/1,024th. make sure i get the math on that right. i don t know if that necessarily convinces people. this will not solve her problem. and everyone focuses on, oh, trump, he s going to keep attacking her, and he will. of course, he would have if it came out she was full
scott jennings, former adviser to senator mitch mcconnell and former special assistant the to george w. bush. joan, let me start with you, the boston globe looked into this, dna test results reported somewhere between 1/64th and 1,1024. this would make her somewhere between .08% and 3% native american. do you think this will put the issue to bed? i don t know that will put the issue to bed. first she had no ancestry. i m not going to give argument to it. she says in the video, that she s not claiming tribal membership, tribal citizenship, only tribes can do that. this is about authenticating her story. her brothers do more than the