walking in the press asking the question, he said, i wouldpd testify. so we will see ifen the president. he has that right. he has the right notshe has th i thin to testify. i think one of the things, in fairness to the guy you put fan, i, i hadnof that up on one of my screens in my office earlier. maybe it was yesterday or today. and i thought what he was responding to was whether or no t if the president violatesresie the court's ordersnt, he be be arrested, not just arrest him. maybe i misunderstood the wayind that point was being introduced. >> and i'm torn there. and i ami, i don't know.'t - >> i think if if you don't, i b and it's interesting, emily's take on this. >> if you have a set of rules in a court rules in, a defendant, a party a party to the party, to a suit violates something that thehas court has laid down. >> and one of the penaltielaids is after a while you get arrested. i don't know how you don't arrest thei how you don'm becauf you don't, then that means that you and i or jesse or tyrus, anyonesses or anye, we'rt ever. and i hope never to be indicted and don't plan to be that we we would be able to use that as