walking in the press asking the question, he said, i wouldpd testify. so we will see ifen the president. he has that right. he has the right notshe has th i thin to testify. i think one of the things, in fairness to the guy you put fan, i, i hadnof that up on one of my screens in my office earlier. maybe it was yesterday or today. and i thought what he was responding to was whether or no t if the president violatesresie the court s ordersnt, he be be arrested, not just arrest him. maybe i misunderstood the wayind that point was being introduced. and i m torn there. and i ami, i don t know. t - i think if if you don t, i b and it s interesting, emily s take on this. if you have a set of rules in a court rules in, a defendant, a party a party to the party, to a suit violates something that thehas court has laid down. and one of the penaltielaids is after a while you get arrested. i don t know how you don t arrest thei how you don m becauf you don t, then that means that you and i