average plunged 520 points, 4.6% amid jitters about europe's debt crisis and growing resignation that the long-term prospects for growth here in the united states are bleak. alison kosik watched the massive selloff up close. >> john, we had yet another brutal session here on wall street today. you know, there's a lot of uncertainty about the economic outlook here in the u.s. and in europe as well. you know, there's worries about france being downgraded like the u.s.' debt was downgraded. they really accelerated the losses in the final minutes of the trading day, and then, of course, there's a fear factor that's around here, you know, investors feel like they're flying blind. no one has any idea of what's coming next or where the economy is headed, and it's that certainty that's feeding this downward spiral, but i also want you to keep in mind, what's also fueling this volatility are the computer models that many institutional investers use to trach stocks, as the market falls, the programs trigger tell i selling at different levels. yesterday investors felt energized by the federal reserve statement that it would likely keep interest rates exceptionally low for another two years, but today investors got a second look at the statement and there's a part that they didn't like, that the fed said to get ready for more slow growth, and traders tell me what you're seeing happening in the market is the market pricing in the rolling likelihood of another recession, john? >> let's go through the rubble with ali velshi and dave ramsey, the host of the dave ramshy show. i want to pick up where alison left off. the people are looking at the u.s. economy and the fed statement which is pretty bleak and look at what's happening in europe and thinking perhaps another recession around the corner, especially when you look at the europe debt issue bubbling up yet again. now it's france. how serious of a concern? >> well, it's kind of strange, because the rumor, it wasn't even fact, the rumor that france might be downgraded from a aaa to a aa plus like the united states cost their biggest bank 15% on the stock market and ended up with this. you got to be wondering here when you're sitting in the united states what does france getting downgraded by one notch have to do with the value of my 401(k), but the problem is it's one of those markets where anybody saying anything slightly negative makes people say i don't want to be holding the bag if this keeps going down, so what's happening is you're seeing money going into gold again. gold hitting $1,800. another noninflation adjusted all-time high and you saw more money going into u.s. treasuries, so the cost of borrowing money for the u.s. government has dropped yet again. this also says something called a flight to safety. people don't want to be involved in any risk whatsoever, and any hint of risk sends them into something that isn't risky and that is costing people in their portfol portfolios, as alison said, a lot of it is program trading and computers but that doesn't really give much comfort to people watching their 401(k)s diminish in size. >> dave, you have people saying worried and what is my path to safety, and a lot of people have been saying, hey, why not gold, the price is way up? is that a good buy? >> well, i'm not a speculator. i'm an investor. and an investor always thinks as we've talked about many times on your show already, we always think long term. a speculator might say, well, gold's probably going to hit $2,000 by christmas, i think probably will, but i'm not worried about christmas, i'm worried about christmas 15 years now for my 401(k). this is what's known as a bubble. and it's going to burst when the fear subsides. and so i don't want to be in gold and i don't want to be in gold at all. but if you want to play the daily run on gold, you can probably make some money. that's not what i do, though. >> i was having a conversation with fareed zakaria about what the markets are looking for, and he said especially after the fed statement yesterday there's a lot of concern that washington, not the economy at large, but washington in particularly won't do any steps to encourage growth and job creation. let's listen. >> the market is saying what we care more than anything else about is whether or not you're going to get economic growth and the market is right in this particular case. so, what is our policy? what is our national strategy to boost economic growth, to create jobs, to generate demand from american consumers? we have none. >> "a," is that true, ali, in your view, "b," we have none and is that what the markets are looking for? >> we had growth somewhere, we didn't have it in the united states but we had it in other parts of the world where we can manufacture things or sell services to them, that would be great. but when you see the soft economy all over the place, where does growth come from? it doesn't come out of nowhere, generally it comes from the fact that people are working, their wages are increasing, so they buy things, that creates demand and companies then hire more people, and expand their workforces. the problem with that is that it's not -- we've had unsustainable growth for a long time. why should we just be growing and growing and growing? so we don't have a plan to get people back to work, and without that back to work, you don't get more tax revenues in the government. your debts don't get smaller. there has to be some plan and that plan means making it easy for employers to hire people and providing incentives which might be tax cuts or credit to businesses that are most likely to hire people here in the united states. we'd have no such plan as you know better than anyone, john, we have no such plan or anything even resembling such a plan in the united states. >> and so in the absence of that, dave, i was reading that statement from the fed yesterday and i kept reading it over and over again. it's just one piece of paper and i kept reading it, reading it, trying to find something, aha, there's a nugget of good, but it says that the growth projections are now less than they were just two months ago, that the downsides, potential huge risks to the economy, more than they were two months ago. persistent, chronic unemployment as far as the eye can see. when you go through that and you interact with your listeners, people who call in with questions, with people who you are helping with investments, how do you deal with the fact that that is an incredibly pessimistic outlook? >> well, it is extremely pessimistic, you're right. and i think what's happened is, is that somewhere along the line we got sold a bill of goods and the bill of goods was that the government had the ability to be the economy's puppet master, and it kind of comes out of the roots of keysian economics there, it started there. and somehow the idea that the president and the congress are responsible for throwing the levers and getting the economy moving. truthfully the economy moves from the bottom up. and to stimulate just like ali said, to simulate the small business out there, will move the needle, because 64% of americans work for a company 500 people or less. >> right. >> and so, you know, you and i are the economy, and so the great recovery will happen from the bottom up, and what washington can do there is they can leave the emotilead the emo of that charge and put people back in charge of their own lives. >> in some cases it's anxious and angry and it's safe to say a lot is frustrated. i want you to weigh in. a single mother from missouri, lucy nob, she's a single mother, times are tough, resources are scarce and she spends a few hundred bucks to do this, play for an airplane to fly around lower manhattan, thanks for the downgrade, you should all lose your jobs. she also wanted to send it my way down here to washington but we have a no-fly zone around the nation's capital for security reasons. ali, people are look for somebody to blame. there is a culprit? >> there isn't a culprit. there isn't, john. i mean, economic downturns are part of history. they happen. we had thought over the years that we had had the ability to make them shorter and shallower and the recession of 2008 showed us that that wasn't actually true. the economy is not science. for people out there wondering, saying you don't understand the economy, dave put it correctly. it's you. if you are going to spend more, if you go out to dinner, if you see your 401(k) going down and you make a decision you're not going on a trim or spep or spen something, it's the economy. the thing that makes people spend is the value of your home or savings or investments increasing or the value of your wage increasing, that's it. or you marry a rock star or rob a bank, that's the only way you get richer in society. we need those options in front of us, as for the woman that did that banner, it's american timi economy, right, dave? >> she did, right. >> absolutely she did. >> people looking for a victim, how does it affect their behavior, dave, when they're down like that? >> it does. instead of looking to themselves, and this sense of self-reliance that made this country great. they're saying congress, fix my life. oops, you didn't do it. mr. president, fix my life. oops, you didn't do it. so, i don't feel hopeful. i don't feel prosperous, and then based on that feeling, that's consumer confidence is one way we measure that, they don't go into the marketplace. i'm not purporting that people go into the marketplace to spend willy-nilly to drive the economy, i'm not one that believes that. they are not saving correctly and panicking and pulling their money out of the market right now, all of this has to do with the broken hope, this lack of hope. and so -- and that is a leadership breakdown in washington, so in that sense we can point at both parties and that's what this lukewarm compromise that really made no one happy did to the markets. the markets lost their hope with that. >> dave ramsey, ali velshi, rocky day, but appreciates your insights. we'll keep in touch. thanks so much. the audacity of sarah, yes, that sarah. the republicans running for president have a big debate and a big straw poll in iowa. we know 9 of the 12 supercommittee charged with finding more deficit cuts. are they ready to bargain in faith over tax increases or medicare cuts or is a group picked to protect the status quo? gas and bloating. with three strains of good bacteria to help balance your colon. you had me at "probiotic." [ female announcer ] phillips' colon health. at exxon and mobil, we engineer smart gasoline that works at the molecular level to help your engine run more smoothly by helping remove deposits and cleaning up intake valves. so when you fill up at an exxon or mobil station, you can rest assured we help your engine run more smoothly while leaving behind cleaner emissions. it's how we make gasoline work harder for you. exxon and mobil. worries about europe drove much of the stock market's drop today, but worries about washington also were a huge part of the volatility and uncertainty and tonight we have important new pieces of a critical puzzle. congressional leaders have named 9 of the 12 members of the so-called supercommittee charged with finding at least $1.5 trillion in additional deficit reduction. the white house, again, made clear today it wants more tax revenues as part of any committee deal, and the house republican leadership just as quick made it clear it views tax increases as a nonstarter, so is this enterprise destined to fail already, or are there ingredients for a grand compromise, david gergen is here and dave herbert, a former "new york times" columnist. and i want to go into the particulars of the members in a minute, but, bob, to you first, a quick headline, when you look at the nine members so far, do you see status quo, gridlock, beholden to the leadership or do you see maybe a recipe for surprise? >> i don't see a recipe for surprise. i see status quo, but i also thought that when they came up with the decision to create this supercommittee that it was going to be status quo. i don't see where the give is going to come from, and i don't see, you know, we had the debt ceiling and the potential for default hanging over the government and they couldn't come up with an agreement then. i don't see how they're going to do it in a few shorts months by thanksgiving. >> david, the same not optimistic, i won't call it pessimistic, but do you see maybe in the members potential? >> i think bob herbert is fundamentally right. when you look at this group, three of the members were on -- one democratic senator and two republican congressmen were on the simpson/bowles commission that tried to come up with the grand bargain, propose a grand bargain. all three were against it. and the simpson/bowles commission. another republican senator walked out of the conversations with joe biden about trying to come up with some big compromise, show, john, i think it will be very tough with what they've got. the issue is going to be if six members of one party hang together, can they pick off a seventh from the other side? and people will be looking at who is the potential break point, who is the potential person who could form a compromise, otherwise you come out 6-6 in the committee and it's a nonstarter and you don't have something to vote on. >> you start on the senate side, who might be the compromise, you have senator kerry, he was a presidential nominee. patty morey, the knocks at the same time she chairs the democratic senatorial campaign committee, she's raising money for the democratic candidates and saying the republicans are killing medicare while she's serving on the committee that medicare cuts might be on the table. and liberals don't like max baucus, and here's an interesting part, you mentioned who are the potentials. jon kyl didn't like the negotiations with the vice president. some conservatives worry he's retiring after this term, they think he might be looking for a big achievement. rob portportman, he's widely vi as a potential vice presidential candidate, the new senator from ohio, worked in the bush budget office, yes, he's a conservative, but they don't view him as an ideologue. might he be a deal maker? >> there's a possibility that one side could pick off one member from the other side, but the problem then is it's got to go to the congress. i just think that this whole thing is fraught with politics. and ideology. people have rigid ideological positions, and i just don't see how a grand compromise could work. if the president and john boehner who supposedly had come close to some kind of an agreement and that couldn't work, i don't see how it's more likely to work when you throw it open to members of congress. >> and, david gergen, does it make any difference in the game of washington chess all three of these republicans relatively good relationship with their leadership, these three democrats good relationship with their leadership, you come over to the house side, speaker boehner picked three republicans with whom he has very good relationships, nancy pelosi has the final picks, the democratic leader. does she have any special leverage now that she knows all the other members? >> yeah, well, it makes it -- it makes her picks obviously more interesting, but nancy pelosi, as you well know, john, has said going into the 2012 elections, there are three issues on the table, medicare, medicare, medicare. she's going to send people in there who are going to refuse to have any big cuts on entitlements, what i'm less certain about we don't know when john boehner was agreeing to the $800 billion in new tax revenues what that involved. was there a formula there that if you were -- if you reform taxes, that revenue would come out of growth as opposed to higher taxes. i don't know the answer to that, but there may be some give in there. there's some aspects of this -- i wouldn't write this off, but i do agree with bob herbert that the outlook is not optimistic. >> john, one more point i could make? >> sure. >> quickly. even if they can come up with an agreement, what we're talking about is a move toward austerity here, which it seems to me in this economic environment is exactly the wrong way to go, so an agreement, if anything, in the short term will likely harm the economy, and make unemployment even worse. so, we're in a really terrible fix here. >> which brings me to this point, you mentioned an age of austerity perhaps coming here. we went back and counted, the president in recent days pivoted and wants to focus on jobs for the american people. we found six examples going back to 2009, when he said it's time to stop talking about what we're talking about and focus on jobs. you knew i was going to be seeing you, 18 of the 20, 18 asked a variation of -- >> jobs. >> -- where are the jobs, when are they coming back? >> look, this is something that i ask every single one of my economic advisers every single day, because i know that ultimately the measure of an economy is, is it producing jobs that help people support families and send their kids to college. that's the single most important thing we can do. >> david, that's two years ago. you see it from the left, you see it from progressives more toward the center, lots of disappointment in this president and you see every other breath of the republican presidential candidate saying, he promised you jobs, he has failed. will we see a sustained focus from the president on jobs? >> don't know. we've just heard from the federal reserve, too, that they think the next two years we're not going to have much growth and many new jobs. john, i think that the most important thing he can do right now is to take time away from campaigning, turn seriously, bring the leaders of the congress back and cut a deal on jobs and do something that gives people a reassurance that we're going to actually do something real in their lives. this will help to staunch the flow of blood in the stock market and will give people more confidence. maybe if he can get the jobs issue moving with a bipartisan kind of deal, i think the makings of it are there, maybe he can change the environment in this debt commission is going to work. but i do think bob herbert is right, i agree with him on a lot of these issues, we disagree on others, that you've got to get this jobs issue right. he's got to get moving on this. this country right now feels as if there's no one in charge. >> bob, it's both a leadership and a credibility question, is it not the? >> oh, it is. david is absolutely right about the need for the president to essentially come off the campaign trail, really focus on jobs, in an environment when you don't have a lot of tools for job creation begin to bring people together and try to forge some kind of bipartisan agreement on jobs. now, i know this is difficult, but i think that's what the president is obliged to do. that's where -- that's -- leadership is called for and he's the one that's obliged to provide that leadership. >> bob herbert, david gergen, appreciate your insights on these two important topics tonight. still to come here, sarah palin isn't in the big iowa republican debate tomorrow night or on the iowa straw poll ballot on saturday. so, why, oh, why, is she rolling into iowa this week? is that smart? maybe selfish? also anderson cooper joins us live from somalia where bono among those trying to help the starving. my doctor told me calcium is best absorbed in small continuous amounts. only one calcium supplement does that in one daily dose. new citracal slow release... continuously releases calcium plus d for the efficient absorption my body needs. citracal. as much as i can about a company before i invest in it. that's why i like fidelity. they give me tools and research i can't get anywhere else. their stock screener lets me search for stocks with more than 140 criteria. i can see what their experts are thinking and even call them to bounce an idea off of one of their investment professionals. a good strategy relies on good insight. if you wanted to learn more about a company, i think you'd actually have to be there. welcome back. here's the latest news you need to know right now. using a robot, technicians this afternoon disrupted what the fbi calls a potential explosive device found on a gas line in oklahoma. a law enforcement official tells cnn it contained black powder and propane and had some sort of timer. the pentagon said 17 navy s.e.a.l.s, not 22, were among the 30 americans when the u.s. helicopter was shot down over afghanistan. and this afternoon arizona petitioned the supreme court to allow it to begin enforcing the tough anti-immigration law the state passed last year. one of nasa's mars rovers is along the edge of a 14-mile-wide crater. in this just released video, you can see it sloping down from the hills to the rim. and they've posted satellite images how the tsunami from last mar march's earthquake in japan hit an ice shelf in antarctica, causing it to break off and when we come back we go to somalia and anderson cooper. and a republican congressman wants to know if the white house is endangering our troops by sharing classified information with hollywood. ♪ [ country ] [ man ] ♪ gone, like my last paycheck ♪ gone, gone away ♪ gone, like my landlord's smile ♪ ♪ gone, gone away ♪ my baby's gone away with dedicated claims specialists... and around-the-clock service, travelers can help make things better quicker. will your auto and home insurer... be there when you need them most? for an agent or quote, call 800-my-coverage... or visit travelers.com. [ male ] using clean american fuel is just a pipe dream. ♪ [ female announcer ] we're rolling away misperceptions about energy independence. did you know that today about a quarter of all new transit buses use clean, american natural gas? we have more natural gas than saudi arabia has oil. so how come we're not using it even more? start a conversation about using more natural gas vehicles in your community. of these abandoned racetracks in america today. automotive performance is gone. and all we have left are fallen leaves and broken dreams and -- oh. wait a second. that is a dodge durango. looks like american performance is doing just fine. ♪ carry on. ♪ actions we are told at a young age speak louder than words and in syria tonight the actions of the brutal regime speak volumes. new violent attacks on anti-government protesters in strongholds in northern and eastern syria. activists report intense gunfire and say three people are dead and eight wounded in the new attacks. and it came despite the esscalation in u.s. policy that cnn is told that will call for a call for bashar assad to step down, and it includes a new push from condemnations and sanctions from european unions and the united nations security council. russia and china are resisting tough new sanctions and the obama administration, well, it's not hiding its frustration. >> we think it is past time for all council members to put the interests of the syrian people rather than particular bilateral issues or interests at the forefront of their action and for the council to continue as it did last week with our strong support to deliver very strong message that what is happening in syria is unacceptable and it needs to be stopped. >> cnn's arwa damon is working her sources inside syria from neighboring lebanon tonight, and, arwa, this appears to be a cycle, the international community intensifies the heat and president assad intensifies the crackdown. >> reporter: yeah, john, that is certainly exactly how it seems to be playing out. we have this ongoing military offensive in the eastern part of the country, and the military build-up, it would seem with hundreds being detained in a number of different villages. and we're just receiving right now information from the lebanese -- from the local coordination committees of syria that the death toll in hama has risen to 15. and so it most certainly seems that the syrian government is trying to continue to play both sides in the sense that on the one hand it's still promising political reforms, it's making what activists would call superficial moves, but on the other hand appears just as intense to continue cracking down militarily. >> from the united states treasury department, new sanctions against the largest mobile phone operator and a major syrian bank and its subsidiary in lebanon. any sense that tightening the economic noose will have any impact on the regime's behavior? >> well, john, it seems that the tightening of that noose by the united states is not likely to have that great of an impact on syria. now, should that be followed by more sanctions by european countries especially those that have interests in syria's energy sector, that could perhaps have a greater impact. but what is really going to tighten the noose on this regime is going to be something that is going to have to be beyond words, beyond rhetoric, and beyond sanctions, because this is a regime that is fighting for its very existence. it's a regime that ever since it came into power with assad sr., the current president's father, 40 years ago, has worked to build up the institutions that two allow for it to stay into power. so, for those institutions to begin to crumble and for the regime to begin to fall, it is going to take much more drastic action by the international community. >> arwa damon in beirut for us tonight, arwa, thank you. also major international news today in somalia, even though the world food program says it may run out of food supply for somalia within three weeks, the african union postponed a donor pledging conference for two weeks until august 25th. one african aid group calling that a message of apathy to the rest of the world. cnn's andzerson comer who is in somalia heard a much more urgent call to action today in an interview with activist and musician bono. >> 13, how have died in the last few months. it's true, people seem to prefer to watch people on the high streets of london fight policemen rather than watching children of somalia fighting for their lives. people watch the values, you know, stock values crumble while, you know, i think about our own sense of values tumbling, because this will define who we are. this is a defining moment for us, and there's lots to distract us, and there's serious issues. people's livelihoods. >> live from somalia at the top of the hour and anderson is with us live from mogadishu. anderson, you hear the urgent call from bono. you are seeing the urgent desperation first hand, and then you hear things like a major donor conference postponed for two weeks, even though the food could run out in three. it has to spark a profound sense of outrage. >> reporter: well, i mean, it is shocking to hear that. not surprising, though. i mean, first of all, african union troops, by the way, have been fighting and dying here for years. there's 9,000 african union troops, ugandans and groups from burundi, but the silence on the part of arab governments around the world, the silence on the part of islamic governments around the world, the failure of them to even bolster the peacekeeping forces here, these peacekeeping forces, the ugandan troops have been fighting and dying. they are undermanned and desperate for more troops to try to create safe hashers to deliver food, but that isn't happening. i was at a hospital, john, here in mogadishu today, where the security situation was so bad we could only stay there for about 30 minutes, but in that time we saw this couple sitting on a bed, and noticed that in between them was a child wrapped in a shroud. it was their last child. two of their other children had already died. this was their last child, a little boy named ali, he was just 1 years old and he had died a short time before we got there. and they didn't have the money to bury him, they didn't know what to do. they were just sitting there for hours on the bed not sure what to do. and you see this time and time again. i mean, the time has run out. and the world food program is, you know, they're trying to make the headline. they're trying to get people to pay attention that they have three weeks of food supplies left. and yet it seems to be falling on deaf ears, particularly that donor conference. >> and so people who have a history of trying to help like bono, you could hear the frustration in the short clip we played. tell us more about that interview. and i watched last night as well, you are trying -- sometimes celebrities come forward to try to shake people to their senses. what more did he tell you? >> reporter: well, you know, he's interesting because he's actually very well informed on both short-term and long-term solutions. because the problem here, there's the short-term, the immediate humanitarian crisis, they need $2 billion for this. that's what they believe they need to address the needs of people here. they only have a billion dollars that's actually been sent, a billion dollars that's in the pipeline, so that's 50% shortfall, so that's the immediate need they need to figure out, but also long term, we talked about agricultural needs. there have been u.s.-backed programs, usaid-backed programs in kenya and ethiopia that is working right now and keeping the drought from having the same impacts there as here. it's both short-term and long-term solutions we talk about on 360. and sarah palin's latest surprise, she's getting back on a bus and driving to a state, well, a state the other republican president been candidates had hoped to have all to themselves. here at quicken loans, we take special pride in servicing clients that serve our country. my name is marjorie reyes. i'm a chief warrant officer. i am very grateful and appreciative that quicken loans can offer service members va loans. it was very important for me to be able to close and refinance my home quickly. i wanted to lower my mortgage payment. quicken loans guided me through every step of the process. the whole experience was amazing! [ tony ] serving those who serve us all... one more way quicken loans is engineered to amaze. handle more than 165 billion letters and packages a year. that's about 34 million pounds of mail every day. ever wonder what this costs you as a taxpayer? millions? tens of millions? hundreds of millions? not a single cent. the united states postal service doesn't run on your tax dollars. it's funded solely by stamps and postage. brought to you by the men and women of the american postal workers union. ♪ [ male announcer ] if you're in a ford f-150 and you see this... it's the end of the road. the last hurrah. it's when ford's powertrain warranty ends. but in this ram truck, you've still got 39,999 miles to go. ♪ guts. glory. ram. ♪ here she goes again. remember when sarah palin rolled her bus tour through massachusetts and up into new hampshire? just as mitt romney was announcing his presidential candidacy? innocent co-eincidencecoinciden intended. cnn was the first to report that sarah palin was getting back on the bus and rolling into iowa and here's the innocent coincidence, or coincidences, there's a presidential debate there tomorrow night. republican event. and the big ames presidential straw poll that's saturday. governor palin isn't in the debate or the straw poll ballot, so why crash a week that's pretty important to those who are officially in the race? is that smart? selfish? or so what? republican consultant rich galen is here along with cornell belcher who worked for the obama campaign in 2008 and cnn contributor john adwan, a senior political columnist for "newsweek" and the daily beast, if you're in one of the other campaigns, this is a big week to try to get traction -- >> right. >> -- and in comes palin-o-rama, you have to be po'd. >> she's the girl who sat at the cool kids' table in high school and graduated and every time there's a dance she comes back to remind everybody she's the coolest girl. go to college. whatever. just get out of here. >> that's the republican take, i'm afraid to ask anybody else. >> actually, i can't give a better take than that. here's the thing. here's the problematic if you are t-paw and you are trying to struggle to get traction here, she overshadows almost everyone else in that field, even those front-runners, she overshadows them and makes it hard for t-paw and the other candidates to gain traction. that's who she is really hurting. >> she not only announced she's going in there and raising money, but she puts up a flashy video, if you like governor palin or don't like governor palin, she's a very smart self-promoter and she does a pretty good job on her website with these videos. >> they're the ones who do some of the hardest work in america, who grow our food and run our factories and fight our wars. they love their country in good times and bad, and they're always proud of america. >> so, the heartland reference there, iowa state fair pictures, john, she's good. >> yeah. and i don't know about you, but every time i go on a summer vacation, i like to release a promo video before just to really, you know, frame the whole thing for everybody. i mean, this is really bizarre, right? first of all, when the republican strategist rich galen is doing the high school girl metaphor, you know she's worn out her welcome. but second of all, this is really sort of a strange bid for attention, much more than anything resembling a serious presidential bid, and clearly it's no coincidence, but there doesn't seem to be any larger plan, just a lot of self-promoti self-promotion, it's kind of bizarre behavior. >> i want to watch to see how it plays out, but first i want to turn to something that for the moment i'm going to make the bold statement is more important. it's the supercommittee that has been named, now we have 9 of the 12 members of the supercommittee and they have to come up with $1.5 trillion deficit reduction, wall street has made clear it would like more than that. i'll walk over to the wall and show some of the members, and, john, i want you to go first, i want to show you the senate picks, 6 senate picks, three republicans, kyl, toomey, and portman, and then we'll move on to the house side. you were a founding member of the centrist group, no labels, you want the guys to strike a grand bargain. is this a group to do that? >> it's a profound cynicism and it's the party leaders that recycles the original problem that got us here. instead of appointing people like the gang of six serious people who sat down in the room and reached across the aisle to reach solutions, those gang of six were intentionally excludes, instead of tom coburn, you get pat toomey, the only members of the bowles/simpson committee appointed were the people that voted against the recommendations. this is a pathetic recycling of the original problem, and i'm not optimistic at all. >> that is the general consensus, rich and cornell, and, john, stay with us, that's the consensus, three people loyal to harry reid, he does not want to give up the medicare issue before the election. pat toomey had led the anti-tax group club for growth, these are close to mitch mcconnell. portman more of a pragmatist, rich galen, what about the contrarian argument because the guys are beholden to the leadership and because anti-tax republicans trust this guy, that if they come up with a deal that has tax reform, not, you know -- broad tax reform that brings washington more money but lowers rates, he's the kind of guy who could sell that? >> well, i was listening to bob herbert earlier who is very smart but i think he's wrong in this regard. it's like going into labor negotiations saying these guys are so far apart they'll never settle, they always settle. i think if you look at these six, you look at the -- i think the secret is baucus and portman, they've put on the two real true believers and somebody who can actually make a deal, baucus can make a deal, portman can make a deal, and then on the house side as well, they'll be one in each -- in each of the -- in each of the groupings that can make a deal. >> we don't know the democrats yet on the house side. >> but that is probably the one, and i think that -- and you only need one switcher, assuming you keep -- >> conservatives have raised worries about fred upton, some people in the tea party things he might cut a deal. here's a guy close to the conservative base, had a famous back-and-forth when he went up to speak to the house republicans. cornell, these are not your friends -- >> i need to push back the crap that it's equal on both sides. when you look at the senate picks and you look at toomey who is ideologically entrenched, and kerry and baucus and senator murray, there's not one of those senators who is ideologically entrenched as a toomey and immovable. baucus quite frankly some are questioning maybe medicare is on the table. but when you look at some of those republicans and how entrenched they are, it's not equal, we should stop pretending it's equal, they are doing ideological battle and it's not the same on both sides. >> i can keep hearing this from paul krugman and other folks that the problem here is the center. the problem is not the center. the pro been is hyperpartisanship and it's not about moral equivalence here, it's about that both leaders intentionally side stepped the gang of six and that shows bad faith in my opinion. >> the gang of six are out there, but you do us a disservice when you say it's hyperpartisanship on both sides, because it's not. none of those three senators, democratic, are as close to hyperpartisan, it's not equal. it's not equal. >> okay. all right. all right. we'll watch this play out. this is a -- this is a very consequential, important policy debate. incredibly important policy debate. we'll see leader pelosi's picks, we'll move on from there. hopefully they'll surprise us. i understand. hopefully they'll surprise us. ta movie on the raid that killed osama bin laden might be in the theaters early next year thumbs down and asks if team obama is sharing classified secrets. that's next. [ male announcer ] this is the network. a network of possibilities. excuse me? my grandfather was born in this village. [ automated voice speaks foreign language ] [ male announcer ] in here, everyone speaks the same language. ♪ in here, forklifts drive themselves. no, he doesn't have it. yeah, we'll look on that. [ male announcer ] in here, friends leave you messages written in the air. that's it right there. [ male announcer ] it's the at&t network. and what's possible in here is almost impossible to say. but when she got asthma, all i could do was worry ! specialists, lots of doctors, lots of advice... and my hands were full. i couldn't sort through it all. with unitedhealthcare, it's different. we have access to great specialists, and our pediatrician gets all the information. everyone works as a team. and i only need to talk to one person about her care. we're more than 78,000 people looking out for 70 million americans. that's health in numbers. unitedhealthcare. of these abandoned racetracks in america today. automotive performance is gone. and all we have left are fallen leaves and broken dreams and -- oh. wait a second. that is a dodge durango. looks like american performance is doing just fine. ♪ carry on. ♪ there's a dust up about a made for life drama. the obama administration is cooperating with oscar winning movie maker on such a project and a republican congressman is crying foul. are they getting access to classified information about procedures and tactics and is the white house cooperation perhaps in exchange for an october 2012 release, just before the next presidential election. both the pentagon and the cia acknowledge meeting with the bin laden movie team but they say it is routine and that those working on this project are getting the same kind of background briefings routinely given when writers and filmmakers are exploring military issues and any suggestion that secrets are being shared or politics play a supporting role here are out of bounds. >> the claims are ridiculous. when people including you in this room are working on articles, books, documentaries, movies that involve the president, ask to speak to administration officials we do our best to accommodate them to make sure the facts are correct. that's hardly a novel approach to the media. we do not discuss classified information. i would hope that as we face a continued threat from terrorism the house committee on homeland security would have more important topics to discuss than a movie. >> is congressman king satisfied? he's with us from his district in new york. what do you say? they say this is routine and nothing to worry about. >> it makes no sense at all. the fact is for the last 90 days ever since the raid, which i give president obama total credit for. he showed extraordinary courage and strong decision making in authorizing that. this is nothing against president obama's decision. it's a real reflection on this administration. for 90 days we've had sensitive information on top of sensitive information being disclosed to the press. so many things including reports of a pakistani doctor, reports of a second cia operation. an article in the new yorker last week recounted minute by minute the whole operation that was carried out to get bin laden. >> let me jump in on one point. secretary gates and a lot of people including yourself complained about leaks. there are a lot of complaints about leaks in washington. that new yorker article you mentioned quoted military commanders and not anybody inside the white house. the specific question about this movie, there have been a lot of leaks and people think a lot of them have been reckless and compromised security, do you have any specific information that this movie team is getting classified information? >> that's why i asked for the investigation. i'm asking for the inspectors general in the department of defense and cia in view of the poor track record of this administration to show what precautions and procedures are put in place to make sure that no sensitive information has been given out and the reason it's more of an issue that it may be otherwise is because the administration has shown itself incapable of keeping sensitive information secret and if they are disclosing it to newspapers, magazines and the media and to god knows who else, how can we be sure they won't disclose it to a hollywood producer. it's a cause for real concern and i can tell you i have so much contact from people in the intelligence community today fully supporting what i'm doing and saying that it's overdo. >> i have your press release announcing and attached the letters to the two inspectors general. the film is reportedly to be released next october just a month before the november 12th, 2012 elections. it raises the suggestion that perhaps the white house sees a political gain here. do you think this president would sell access essentially for political gain? >> i would think that people in the administration may think they can make a deal with hollywood not intending to disclose anything sensitive or classified but their conduct in the last 90 days shows they're not capable of deciding what's sensitive and what's not. we need to know what precautions and procedures are put in place. i heard from people in the cia when they agreed to this cooperation, they had no idea this was going to be released three weeks before election day. that is totally new news to them. they had no idea about it. some of them feel as if there's a breach of faith. >> the white house rebutts that. i want to read you a statement we received from the filmmakers. our upcoming film project about the decade long pursuit of bin laden has been in the works for many years and integrates the collective efforts of three administrationings, including those of presidents clinton, bush and obama. there is no basis so suggest that this film will represent this enormous victory otherwise. are you satisfied that they say this will not be partisan? >> no one said more than i have. this is a great victory for president obama. he proved himself to be an outstanding commander in chief in this instance. i said that. i'm not trying to take any credit away from president obama at all. but again, all i'm saying is that if this is supposed to be a nonpartisan or unpartisan movie, people in the cia have told me they were not told it was coming out three weeks before election. it raises more questions. >> it raises more questions. when you get the answers from the inspectors general if they can satisfy you that they met with these guys but we meet with everybody. they meet with documentary workers doing factual nonfictional things. if they satisfy you we had the meetings and no classified information and will we get another press release saying i'm satisfied? >> depending on what they tell me. i've been very bipartisan or nonpartisan as chairman of the homeland security