i don't think anybody who was not in the operation can actually pass a detailed comment on the rightness and wrongness of it. you know, this is fiendishly difficult policing. but criticism of the police has been swift, from across the political spectrum and those who attended the vigil. authorities in the republic of ireland recommend temporarily suspending use of the astrazeneca vaccine, after a report of four new cases of blood clotting incidents in adults who'd had the jab in norway. the foreign secretary makes another call for the immediate release of british—iranian nazanin zaghari—ratcliffe — after she faces new allegations of anti—government propaganda in court. and it's the music industry's biggest awards night of the year — the grammys — they're being held at a virtual ceremony in los angeles. hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. they have just been printed off the printer here so we can go through them. with me are are the former pensions minister, ros altmann, and the independent�*s business commentatorjames moore. tomorrow's front pages starting with... they've had a bit of a sneak preview, let's bring you up—to—date. the story of the moment is those rather ugly scenes in south london last night. the official event was cancelled, that vigil for the last night. the official event was cancelled, that vigilfor the murder victim sarah everard. and the conflict when the police features heavily on the front of the metro. the guardian has more images of people mocking their own vigils, again a couple of instances during the course of the day putting a candlelight vigil this evening outside the houses of parliament and it headlines with the chief commissioner of the metropolitan police refusing to quit and heading at armchair critics of police tactics. the mail's headline is the �*shaming of the met�*, reporting on the public backlash over the police's handling of the event. one of the scene arrested being handcuffed on the ground. an interview with her in the metro tomorrow morning. the telegraph carries the same lead but also reports that close allies of the prime minister say he accepts it was a mistake to delay the start of the first national coronavirus lockdown. of course today is the anniversary of when he was shown the data, the 14th of march, but another nine days before lockdown was held and introduced on the 23rd of that month. and a northern transport hub is to be set up in yorkshire — that's according to the yorkshire post — with hundreds of civil service jobs to be moved out of the capital. let us begin with the mail, and rise, the shaming of the mat, is that how you see the events and you think the papers are capturing the degree of anger about the story? i think the papers are capturing the degree of anger, but i must admit that this is such a difficult situation and the vigil was going ahead to, the police were told her that was not legal, it had not been approved. in the police are being put up in a really difficult position. i'm not condoning what the police did but i do think that they were put in such an impossible position. they are supposed to uphold the law and supposed to make sure that people are safe and yet one also completely understands, and i certainly do, the anger of women even what had happened to sarah and what happened in this awful, awful situation. , ., , what happened in this awful, awful situation. , . , �* , what happened in this awful, awful situation. , ., , �* , ., , , situation. james, it's a very, very stron: situation. james, it's a very, very strong front _ situation. james, it's a very, very strong front page. _ situation. james, it's a very, very strong front page. not _ situation. james, it's a very, very strong front page. notjust - situation. james, it's a very, very strong front page. notjust that l strong front page. notjust that very bold headline by the very conscious contrast and photographs between cressida dick and the defence of her officers and then the image of we can't see the officers are, but restraining a woman protester. you know, pictures are powerful things and the newspapers are deploying them pretty effectively on the front pages. if effectively on the front pages. if the old adage, a picture tells a thousand — the old adage, a picture tells a thousand words, or thousand stories i can't _ thousand words, or thousand stories i can't member how it goes. it�*s i can't member how it goes. it's ve late i can't member how it goes. it's very late at _ i can't member how it goes. it�*s very late at night, if i was worried they can look it up. i think we know what you are saying. i they can look it up. i think we know what you are saying.— they can look it up. i think we know what you are saying. i hope you know what you are saying. i hope you know what i am saying- _ what you are saying. i hope you know what i am saying. but _ what you are saying. i hope you know what i am saying. but it _ what you are saying. i hope you know what i am saying. but it really - what you are saying. i hope you know what i am saying. but it really is - what i am saying. but it really is striking. — what i am saying. but it really is striking. is— what i am saying. but it really is striking, is horrible and shuttering the bad~ _ striking, is horrible and shuttering the bad. it's not really what you expect — the bad. it's not really what you expect to — the bad. it's not really what you expect to see of policing in this country— expect to see of policing in this country at _ expect to see of policing in this country at all. it's a sort of thing von'd _ country at all. it's a sort of thing you'd expect to see from countries where _ you'd expect to see from countries where you — you'd expect to see from countries where you have regimes which are to be used _ where you have regimes which are to be used the — where you have regimes which are to be used the police as an arm of a very— be used the police as an arm of a very nasty— be used the police as an arm of a very nasty stage. not in a democratic country like britain. i think— democratic country like britain. i think this — democratic country like britain. i think this could have been avoided because _ think this could have been avoided because they knew this was going to happen— because they knew this was going to happen commit there were organisers out there _ happen commit there were organisers out there that had trained stewards and they— out there that had trained stewards and they have been making this point today— and they have been making this point today that _ and they have been making this point today that we had trained stewards, they were _ today that we had trained stewards, they were ready, they would have forced _ they were ready, they would have forced a _ they were ready, they would have forced a social distancing. i think the mail— forced a social distancing. i think the mail is— forced a social distancing. i think the mail is really cottoned on to or iatched _ the mail is really cottoned on to or latched onto and reflecting the public — latched onto and reflecting the public outrage. striking from the mail in— public outrage. striking from the mail in particular would you got to remember— mail in particular would you got to remember is they do have a strongly female _ remember is they do have a strongly female readership, but it is a very law and _ female readership, but it is a very law and order paper at the same time _ law and order paper at the same time so— law and order paper at the same time. so for the law and order paper at the same time. so forthe mailto law and order paper at the same time. so for the mail to take this stance _ time. so for the mail to take this stance is, — time. so for the mail to take this stance is, should be worrying for the match— stance is, should be worrying for the match i— stance is, should be worrying for the match i think.— stance is, should be worrying for the match i think. let's look at the metro, because _ the match i think. let's look at the metro, because it's _ the match i think. let's look at the metro, because it's quite - metro, because it's quite interesting they've got it into patty stephenson, you see her on the mail and the metro, a graphic photographed with the photographer that took it caught, it helps it in that took it caught, it helps it in that time image from the translucent or fluorescent jackets from police, and her red hair. it's a very strong visual image just by the time of night. she makes the point barely five foot two, i weigh nothing. you think of, for example, what happened at the stadium in glasgow last weekend. hundreds and hundreds of rangers fans celebrate this great win for their team, the police were saying to them you shouldn't be here, there's a risk of covid but they made a judgement that was better to stand back and except what was an illegal protest contrary to the law and regulations that try to go in and perhaps encounter much bigger resistance. it's a dilemma whichever you cut it. and bigger resistance. it's a dilemma whichever you cut it.— bigger resistance. it's a dilemma whichever you cut it. and as i say i think that's _ whichever you cut it. and as i say i think that's exactly _ whichever you cut it. and as i say i think that's exactly where - whichever you cut it. and as i say i think that's exactly where we - whichever you cut it. and as i say i think that's exactly where we are. | think that's exactly where we are. you can see both sides of this, but if i was one of the people who wanted to express my distress and had they did vigil because of this terrible crime and the murder and the implications that that has for anyone living there, and clearly women are frightened to go out at night, so i would be upset if i was there but also if i was one of the met police on the scene i would be caught between what should i do on one side, should i let this go even though i know it should not be happening? orshould i intervene though i know it should not be happening? or should i intervene and try to stop it happening which is with the law which require me to do? in scotland i think it took the opposite view and it ended up with the fans being able to gather in the way that they wanted. in this case we had the opposite. so we are going to need inquiry and need to look at what's going on. to need inquiry and need to look at what's going on— what's going on. picking up what ou're what's going on. picking up what you're saying _ what's going on. picking up what you're saying with _ what's going on. picking up what you're saying with the _ what's going on. picking up what| you're saying with the organising, we had marshals he could've done this legally and socially distanced. breaking up a diverse racial risk infection miserably for the police officers as they are grappling with protesters, they might have the infection themselves or protesters might who knows. they were saying we would have observed social distancing but look at the picture on the front of this. the process were people all lay down as a kind of mark of respect to sarah everard and approach us about what happened yesterday. it's a parliament square, not much social distancing. but yesterday. it's a parliament square, not much social distancing.- not much social distancing. but it's not much social distancing. but it's not an organised _ not much social distancing. but it's not an organised protest, - not much social distancing. but it's not an organised protest, it's - not much social distancing. but it's not an organised protest, it's a - not an organised protest, it's a spontaneous protest. if you have an organised _ spontaneous protest. if you have an organised protest... can spontaneous protest. if you have an organised protest. . ._ organised protest... can be that spontaneous. — organised protest... can be that spontaneous, somehow - organised protest... can be that spontaneous, somehow it - organised protest... can be that spontaneous, somehow it has . organised protest... can be that. spontaneous, somehow it has been organised even if it's a social media hashtag or whatever. there's something going on. but media hashtag or whatever. there's something going on.— media hashtag or whatever. there's something going on. but up think the oruanisers something going on. but up think the organisers were _ something going on. but up think the organisers were saying _ something going on. but up think the organisers were saying is _ something going on. but up think the organisers were saying is that - something going on. but up think the organisers were saying is that they i organisers were saying is that they applied _ organisers were saying is that they applied for permission, they had gone _ applied for permission, they had gone through all the major things to hold a _ gone through all the major things to hold a protest, i don't think the ones _ hold a protest, i don't think the ones in — hold a protest, i don't think the ones in trafalgar square was organised by a group like that because — organised by a group like that because if you did that and then did it without _ because if you did that and then did it without permission you would be liable _ it without permission you would be liable for— it without permission you would be liable for the 10,000 fine which is what _ liable for the 10,000 fine which is what organisers said. and there's stewards— what organisers said. and there's stewards the tabard to seek him if you've _ stewards the tabard to seek him if you've to— stewards the tabard to seek him if you've to protest, and i've been to a few— you've to protest, and i've been to a few marches in my time. i need to have _ a few marches in my time. i need to have them _ a few marches in my time. i need to have them around and shepherding peopie. _ have them around and shepherding people. it — have them around and shepherding people, it got their eyes off her trouble — people, it got their eyes off her trouble and they do their best to dab it— trouble and they do their best to dab it down. in trouble and they do their best to dab it down-— trouble and they do their best to dab it down. ., , , dab it down. in of these things the oruanisers dab it down. in of these things the organisers if— dab it down. in of these things the organisers if that _ dab it down. in of these things the organisers if that was _ dab it down. in of these things the organisers if that was the - dab it down. in of these things the organisers if that was the best - dab it down. in of these things the organisers if that was the best of l organisers if that was the best of intentions they could not know how many people turn up a clearly numbers were pretty impressive for the weekend, even if it had been an organised event, it's possible that the authorities take welcoming you think you can cope we think you'll end up with more nest the reason we are not allowing it to go ahead and we think these measures would not be enough to prevent the risk of infection. enough to prevent the risk of infection-— enough to prevent the risk of infection. ., ., , ., , ., infection. the contras that is what has happened _ infection. the contras that is what has happened has _ infection. the contras that is what has happened has happened. - infection. the contras that is what has happened has happened. you| infection. the contras that is what - has happened has happened. you see these _ has happened has happened. you see these terrible images, sol has happened has happened. you see these terrible images, so i think you can — these terrible images, so i think you can look back and see... you can look— you can look back and see... you can look at _ you can look back and see... you can look at this— you can look back and see... you can look at this and you can predict this happening. i rememberwhen look at this and you can predict this happening. i remember when the protests— this happening. i remember when the protests got banned i was thinking of all. _ protests got banned i was thinking of all. i_ protests got banned i was thinking of all, i bet this is going to go wrong — of all, i bet this is going to go wrong i— of all, i bet this is going to go wrong. i can see something like this and peopie — wrong. i can see something like this and people turning up anyway and something bad happening. and it has happened _ something bad happening. and it has happened. if i can make that sort of prediction. — happened. if i can make that sort of prediction, as cressida dick said, an armchair— prediction, as cressida dick said, an armchair commentator, if i can make _ an armchair commentator, if i can make that — an armchair commentator, if i can make that prediction that it's going to have _ make that prediction that it's going to have initially someone with experience in these matters ought to be able _ experience in these matters ought to be able to— experience in these matters ought to be able to take that into account and think. — be able to take that into account and think, ok, we may be facing something — and think, ok, we may be facing something like this, well has should we handle _ something like this, well has should we handle it and what should we do? cieariy _ we handle it and what should we do? cieariy was _ we handle it and what should we do? clearly was not done because as the metro— clearly was not done because as the metro said _ clearly was not done because as the metro said patty stephenson is five foot two _ metro said patty stephenson is five foot two and there she is on the floor— foot two and there she is on the floor being manhandled by a couple of buriy— floor being manhandled by a couple of burly officers. a terrible image. and terrible image in the light of the fact we can't escape the fact that it will be part of the thinking on this that the man who is accused of the crime, who is subject to criminal proceedings, not even entered a plea yet, this is no judgement on his guilt or innocence, but the man accused of the crime is a serving metropolitan police officer. and this is what people think of as the people responsible for their safety, terrible, if you like, the optics or the optics are terrible for the police.— like, the optics or the optics are terrible for the police. that's why the are terrible for the police. that's why they are damned _ terrible for the police. that's why they are damned if _ terrible for the police. that's why they are damned if they - terrible for the police. that's why they are damned if they do - terrible for the police. that's why they are damned if they do and i they are damned if they do and damned if they don't and that's why passions have run so high in this case. there aren't any easy answers, we will have to have inquiry but i guess you could argue that if they did not stop this or even tried to stop this what would have happened next? i can see their point of view. but equally as it is going to be one vigil, and we need to have some kind of memorialfor sarah vigil, and we need to have some kind of memorial for sarah everard, vigil, and we need to have some kind of memorialfor sarah everard, then on that basis we would say this was over—the—top. i don't think there's an easy answer and we will need to learn from this. but the underlying fundamental problem is that our country has changed over the past year and we are in a position where people are not supposed to get together. people are not supposed to see each other. which is always unprecedented. find see each other. which is always unprecedented.— see each other. which is always unprecedented. and unnatural as well. unprecedented. and unnatural as well- talking _ unprecedented. and unnatural as well. talking of _ unprecedented. and unnatural as well. talking of which, _ unprecedented. and unnatural as well. talking of which, the - well. talking of which, the telegraph, well either side will talk maybe next and the next paper review. show me my as we never seen her before, an adult woman notjust in the guard we would associated with her. butjust as a woman in a more western, work clothing that she might�*ve warned if she grown up to become a woman here if she had not left tojoin the become a woman here if she had not left to join the group that calls itself islamic state. lockdown delay was lethal mistake allies admit. intriguing this should come out now. would not see anything like this before. — would not see anything like this before. it — would not see anything like this before, it interesting that it's in the telegraph which is a very supportive paper borisjohnson, supportive paper boris johnson, perhaps— supportive paper borisjohnson, perhaps the most supportive or reiiabiy — perhaps the most supportive or reliably supportive of all the papers _ reliably supportive of all the papers. it's quite heavily qualified, i've read through it, there's— qualified, i've read through it, there's well, yes but had not seen it here. _ there's well, yes but had not seen it here. and — there's well, yes but had not seen it here, and this person did not tell him — it here, and this person did not tell him that, and chris whitty and others _ tell him that, and chris whitty and others going to face some hard questions — others going to face some hard questions as well, but it still is the first— questions as well, but it still is the first time we have seen anything like this— the first time we have seen anything like this from boris johnson or from sources— like this from boris johnson or from sources close to, and i think given the paper— sources close to, and i think given the paper which is putting this in we can— the paper which is putting this in we can look is a fairly reliable report~ — we can look is a fairly reliable report. some of the most striking stories— report. some of the most striking stories not— report. some of the most striking stories not involving the protests that have. — stories not involving the protests that have, that are in the papers. your— that have, that are in the papers. your thoughts on this? this is something that almost certainly going to have to be some kind of inquiry into. going to have to be some kind of inquiry into-— inquiry into. there will be an inuui inquiry into. there will be an inquiry to — inquiry into. there will be an inquiry to all— inquiry into. there will be an inquiry to all aspects - inquiry into. there will be an inquiry to all aspects of- inquiry into. there will be an inquiry to all aspects of this | inquiry into. there will be an i inquiry to all aspects of this but this particular story i think will cause real problems within the conservative party because there are lots of conservative members who are still uncomfortable with the whole lockdown idea. and yes they believe that the lockdown may have started later than it should, but they also believe that it's going on a lot longer than it should now because this time last year we did not have the vaccine, we did not have the numbers that we've got now with so many fewer people in hospital and falling ill. we many fewer people in hospital and fallin: ill. ~ ., ., ., falling ill. we will have to leave it there at _ falling ill. we will have to leave it there at the _ falling ill. we will have to leave it there at the moment, - falling ill. we will have to leave it there at the moment, they i falling ill. we will have to leave i it there at the moment, they will both be back in an hour as alive. more papers including what's on the front of the yorkshire evening post, yorkshire post the moment. yorkshire post, do stay with us for that. welcome to click! this week, we're going to be talking about rare and collectible items. now, lara, you've been looking into something that's been getting a lot of hype recently, haven't you? i have. now, can you tell me what is the most collectible item you have in your house? um... this shirt? oh, i know — this thing. everyone's always asking me about this online. how about you ? well, i managed to dig out my peter andre doll! it's has been signed by peter andre himself! no way! all hail the andre! now, the thing is, there are plenty of collectible, valuable things in the world, and by definition, each one of them is very rare. so it might surprise you to learn that people have started to buy digital collectables. see, the thing is, you can make an identical copy of a digital file — you can make millions of them if you want, just with a couple of button presses — so surely, that means that digital items can't be unique. can they? jack dorsey seems to think so. the founder of twitter has put his first—ever tweet up for auction, which may now sell for over $2.5 million — even though we can all access it whenever we want. the secret is that proof of ownership is stored elsewhere online, as something called an nft or non—fungible token — a unique marker that can't be copied, changed or disputed. synth pop artist grimes has sold limited edition copies of her digital art for almost $6 million. and musician blau sold limited edition copies of his ultraviolet album for a whopping $11 million — again, even though anyone can access them online. i don't know about you, but this sounds nuts! laughs. it is rather hard to get your head around. but the idea of somebody being able to prove that they own something completely digital is nothing new. you can prove who owns a bitcoin because there's a public, unchangeable record, and that sits on something called the blockchain. and these nfts use exactly the same technology, just with a bit of a tweak, allowing creators to attach all sorts of conditions to the item that they're selling. along with proof of ownership, they can say how it can be sold or how it can be used. while all the excitement has been around digital items, nfts can serve as proof of sale for anything. buying a house is complicated. it's notjust a matter of being able to afford it, but also committing to that cash being tied up. so imagine you have a mortgage. ownership of your home is split between you and the bank. but the idea of tokenisation is that that ownership can be broken down into any number of pieces, and that means you could have any number of owners. it should also offer some flexibility for you to be able to buy and sell parts of your house if you want to. it's already happening in some places, including new york and dubai. in england and wales, the land registry has been looking at the idea. so we've run a couple of prototypes over the last two years, really to see whether actually technology could enable this. 50 rather than it being a barrier, could it become an enabler? so i think it opens up opportunities for homeownership but also, equally, i think it opens up opportunities in terms of lending against a property. and we all know with increased opportunities becomes wider competition as well. i think the entries at the moment into the market are quite high, in terms of lending. what this allows is to lower those entries to market to own a property. the important thing is land registry issues that token, so it's almost kind of government issuing that token, and that adds an extra sense of assurance and credibility and guarantee. the proof of concept was run in 2019 and it showed that this could technically work, bringing the buying process down from weeks to minutes. however we do this, it's done in such a way that everyone can consume it, without understanding what blockchain is, without understanding what tokenisation is. co—owning a home can be daunting, even when it's with someone you know well, so the idea that we may be owning homes with strangers could feel intimidating. i think this is all about, you know, setting things up in the right way so homeowners should have the ability to own their own home and if they have sold off some of it to other investors, then they should have the right to call that back as part of the deal that they do with those investors. there is still a long way to go for both the lenders and us, whether buying or selling, to be ready to go digital. but in a world where we're used to doing so many things at the click of a button, i can certainly see the appeal. ultimately, tokenisation could simplify everything by leaving a trail of who owns what and what they need to know, with full transparency. but like every new bit of tech, it may bring with it its own problems. we had the 2008 financial crisis which was caused by fancy financial products that people didn't really understand. theyjust saw a big number or, "i can afford a house now" or something like that. and they got into really deep water. and when the system fell over, people lost everything. so we know about fancy financial products. they're dangerous because people don't understand them. they could lose everything and we don't need tokens as an excuse to do this bad idea again. you shrewd and knavish sprite, what hast thou done? - i know not. it's a midsummer night's dream but not as you know it. these are the final rehearsals for dream, a new show from the royal shakespeare company inspired by both shakespeare's original play and the times we live in. as em and jamie move around the space, their motion capture suits allow their movement to be married onto the characters of puck, peaseblossom and the rest of the inhabitants of fairyland. it's been a while since i've had a chance to get into a mocap suit and for some reason it's more of a squeeze than it was since before lockdown. i can't think pie — i mean why. in many ways, this is less like theatre acting and more like the kind of acting that hollywood performers have been doing in cgi films for quite a few years now. you can interact with a fellow performer in the same space but what you actually end up looking like, well, that's up to the digital artist. inexplicably, i have become the black power ranger who i think was only a background character in the original shakespeare text. in each of the 12 live performances, tom here will use a virtual camera to decide the shots that the audience sees, but this is far from a passive show. viewers get to join in and control fireflies that guide puck through the forest, and that means the actors have to improvise depending on the path the audience chooses. now, sweet friends, i need your help, light my way. the soundscape is also live. em plays the �*gesturement�*, a gesture controlled instrument that puck plays in the air. so in theatre, the actors very much rely on each other on stage and also on the technical crew to get the lighting and the scenery sorted. in movies, it's much more about the technical side �*cause there's so much more that can go wrong. and it strikes me this is a mixture of the two, where it's live, you only get one take and you're also reliant on all of the technical stuff working perfectly, including your balls. and when your balls don't register properly, your leg can drop off. laughs this is a very live environment. a real interesting challenge in working a motion capture system, a performance capture system, in a controlled chaos. and interestingly, this is not the first live virtual environment that we've looked at recently that has been built using unreal engine, created by the makers of the game fortnite. unreal engine allows us that flexibility to plug lots of different elements in that would be used in a live environment and control them in a game engine. example, if you move a fader on a lighting desk, a light in the unreal engine will work correspondingly. and it gives us that direct control and flexibility for live performances. this project has been in development for a couple of years now so rather than just being a quick stopgap while theatres are closed, this is a full—on r&d project to explore how theatre can continue to evolve as it has done for centuries. there are so many tools available to us, so many ways in order for us to tell a story, a narrative and connect with an audience, so this is another one of those tools. and also in terms of accessibility, it opens the door for so many people who might not be able to come to certain places. and when we are allowed back into the stalls and the circles, some of this technology could start being integrated into live performances and lead to... well, who knows what kind of show in the future? in this particular project we're testing the technology but who's to say we couldn't look at those motion capture suits and craft beautiful costume around them? and i think that's what's exciting about this, is that if you put this technology in the hands of artists, expected and amazing things can happen. haste, make no delay. dream runs until the 20th of march online and as an added bonus, i won't be in it. in one show we've got peter andre and spencer in a mocap suit. yep, which unfortunately didn't hide the fact that i didn't have his abs, but there you go! listen, this is the short version of the show, there's much more in the full length version and that is waiting for you right now on iplayer. as ever, you can keep up with the team on social media — find us on youtube, instagram, facebook and twitter at bbc click. thanks for watching and we'll see you soon. bye— bye. this is bbc news with the latest headlines for viewers in the uk and around the world. in one of the bloodiest days since the military coup in myanmar, more than 20 demonstrators have been killed in a single neighbourhood of yangon. the british home secretary orders an investigation into police actions during a vigil in memory of the murder victim sarah everard. france is forced to move covid—i9 patients out of paris as intensive care units struggle to cope with a surge in cases. america's disaster agency is brought in as rising numbers of migrant children arrive at the country's southern border. k—pop band bts isjust one of the nominees at tonight's virtual grammy awards.