https://www.afinalwarning.com/523986.html (Natural News) As climate change alarmists continue to insist that we need to cool the planet’s temperatures in order to save it, one approach that is being touted is geoengineering. Some researchers have been supporting the idea of the deliberate mass manipulation of our climate as a “backup plan” if the world does not succeed in reducing carbon emissions by 2 degrees, and now the U.S. government is throwing money behind the plans.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Earth System Research Laboratory Director of Chemical Sciences David Fahey reportedly told staff that the U.S. government is providing $4 million in funding to study two types of geoengineering. Fahey is NOAA’s top climate change scientist.
https://www.afinalwarning.com/506099.html (Natural News) Many geoengineering projects are still underway even though experts warn that manipulating the Earth’s natural systems will only harm the environment, disrupt the food supply and create or intensify conflict.
Last December, China announced that it was planning to expand its cloud seeding program to cover more than one and a half times the size of India by 2025. For decades, the Communist country had been using military aircraft and anti-aircraft guns to seed clouds with silver iodide and liquid nitrogen, thickening water droplets to the point where they would fall as rain or snow.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM) said on March 25.
Solar geoengineering involves increasing the amount of radiation that gets reflected back to Earth to cool the planet. It is a form of geoengineering or the deliberate modification of Earth’s natural systems to tackle climate issues.
In a new report, a panel of scientists recommended allotting $40 million a year to ramp up solar geoengineering research. In particular, it suggested looking into spraying reflective aerosols into the atmosphere, thinning high-altitude clouds and brightening low-altitude marine clouds.
“Climate engineering is a really dumb idea, but it might not be as dumb as doing nothing at this point or continuing to do what we’ve been doing,” Lynn Russell, an atmospheric chemist at the