also, john wood. equally great hair, by the way. you don t have to say that. senior investigator to the house select committee. he s now running for u.s. senate is now running in this. eric i ve now made him flash. i give you a second to wait it out a second. miles, luck, everyone, john. you have been someone who has been on this committee. ross on the outside looking in. you work on the inside. i have to know, with these two witnesses, is there anything to say that these are one of the last of, then the blockbuster? or are we reading too much into those two? i wouldn t worry too much that is those two. those two, i think you re going to hear from a range of witnesses. one of the things that the committee has done really well is he is videotaped oppositions depositions and interviews, weaving it into the hearing. while there might just be two people sitting live at the witness table, we re going to hear from a lot of people who worked in the white house for
have some new reporting on what doj did and did not know about cassidy hutchinson s testimony. what was that? right. so, yesterday, as much of the world, us included, we re sitting in stunned astonishment as we watched the revelation come out from cassidy hutchinson at the witness table, so where the department of justice prosecutors. we understand from some sources that the prosecutors working on this investigation, on the justice department side, we re watching very closely. and they were surprised, very much surprised, at the testimony they were hearing. this gets to a dispute that has been going on for a while, between the justice department and the january 6th committee. the justice department wants the committee to turn over every transcript they have done, with all of these 1000 witnesses, every single one that they have transcribed. and the committee has resisted
what was that? right. so, yesterday, as much of the world, us included, we re sitting in stunned astonishment as we watched the revelation after revelation come out from cassidy hutchinson at the witness table so where the department of justice prosecutors. we understand from some sources that the prosecutors working on this investigation, on the justice department side we re watching very closely. and they were surprised, very much surprised, at the testimony they were hearing. this gets to a dispute that has been going on for a while, between the justice department and the january 6th committee. the justice department wants the committee to turn over every transcript they have done, with all of these 1000 witnesses, every single one that they have transcribed. and the committee has resisted that for a number of reasons. they have said they will work with the justice department,
the witness table, if they were asked about this, the little bit that happened right before the recess, i think one of the things that they would point out is that, you know, the last thing that representative cheney point out is that jeff clark took the fived when he was asked the same questions that they asked the witnesses. if a prosecutor brought that out in a trial, that would be a mistrial. that s like a basic constitutional due process violation. for the life of me, i continue not to understand not only why this committee would not present a different perspective when they have witnesses that could clearly deal with cross examination if there were cross examination. and why do this very powerful presentation, which i think this last hour certainly was, and then at the end point out that people are taking the fifth amendment which they have a constitutional entitlement to do and the courts have said if you let that infect a fact-finding
0 the secretary stated and the five million that was on a public facing website was that the information on the website was incomplete because four kuntys had not uploaded their data. so no credibility? zero to that. during that call, did scott perry mentioned mr. clark and what did he say about him if so? he mentioned mr. clark. he said something to the effect of i think jeff clark is great and i think he s the kind of guy that can get in there and do something about this stuff. this is coming on the heels of the president having mentioned mr. clark in the afternoon call earlier that day. i d like to yield to the gentle woman from wyoming, vice chair cheney. as we discussed at the center of mr. clark s plan to undue the president s election law was a letter. mr. clark e-mailed you and a draft letter he wanted you to sign and to send to georgia state fishes. you testified that this could have grave constitutional consequences. mr. donahue, can you tell us what you meant by