the witness table, if they were asked about this, the little bit that happened right before the recess, i think one of the things that they would point out is that, you know, the last thing that representative cheney point out is that jeff clark took the fived when he was asked the same questions that they asked the witnesses. if a prosecutor brought that out in a trial, that would be a mistrial. that s like a basic constitutional due process violation. for the life of me, i continue not to understand not only why this committee would not present a different perspective when they have witnesses that could clearly deal with cross examination if there were cross examination. and why do this very powerful presentation, which i think this last hour certainly was, and then at the end point out that people are taking the fifth amendment which they have a constitutional entitlement to do and the courts have said if you let that infect a fact-finding
0 the secretary stated and the five million that was on a public facing website was that the information on the website was incomplete because four kuntys had not uploaded their data. so no credibility? zero to that. during that call, did scott perry mentioned mr. clark and what did he say about him if so? he mentioned mr. clark. he said something to the effect of i think jeff clark is great and i think he s the kind of guy that can get in there and do something about this stuff. this is coming on the heels of the president having mentioned mr. clark in the afternoon call earlier that day. i d like to yield to the gentle woman from wyoming, vice chair cheney. as we discussed at the center of mr. clark s plan to undue the president s election law was a letter. mr. clark e-mailed you and a draft letter he wanted you to sign and to send to georgia state fishes. you testified that this could have grave constitutional consequences. mr. donahue, can you tell us what you meant by