The live radar shows relatively dry conditions from philadelphia southward, maybe a little bit of drizzle. But the steadier rain north and west from washington, d. C. Up into north jersey. This is mostly in pennsylvania here and especially lancaster county, berks county, Lehigh Valley and the poconos. But there is plenty more on the way. This giant area in virginia and moving into maryland, now, thats going to move right up across our region so if its not raining where you are now, its not necessarily going to stay that way. Heres the futurecast hour by hour and you can see that all over the place as we move up into the afternoon hours. By Late Afternoon its raining just about everywhere and through the afternoon rush. Yes, its going to be a very wet afternoon rush and then things start to taper off as we go into the evening hours. Now, we still have some fog in parts of the area, wilmington, philadelphia, but a lot of the visibilities are starting to go up. That will be less and less
Minutes. Now ladies and gentlemen please rise for the National Anthem sung by diane from enzi oc. [applause] ladies and gentlemen please welcome citizenship chairman michael reiser. [applause] diane ty you should know is not only a talented performer and artist, she is also a very talented fundraiser and her connection to the National Conference on citizenship is working with our service year project. You may have heard the term the franklin project. Its all a line so we appreciate your efforts on our behalf and we appreciate you bringing her talents to our state once again. [applause] i am significantly less talented. [laughter] and coc is honored to partner with Users Conference with all of the eagles in the room please stand up . People from American University please stand up. [applause] yes. Thank you for being here. This is a fall break for aau and faculty and most of the administration is at a retreat. They are students and campus in a number have joined us and we appreciate the
Because there were not looking for evidence of a legislative intent to create a right to judicial review. Your position is thats already there under the apa. Unless there is evidence of a judicial intent, of a congressional intention to preclude judicial review . Thats exactly right. Thats the presumption created by the apa. The way that your honor articulated it is the way the Supreme Court has articulated it time and again. Thats the governments burden to show by clear and convincing evidence that congress intended to preclude our claims, not our burden to demonstrate that congress intended to create them. If i may, ill move on to the merits of our statutory claim. As i said before, our first claim is that section 215 simply does not apply to call records. In the same statute that congress enacted section 215, in 2001, it added a provision to the stored Communications Act prohibiting the government from acquiring phone records. It created i exceptions to that prohibition. But section
June of 2015 is the better path for the community, not necessarily your clients, the community at large. Changing hearts and minds happens through democracy much more effectively than it happens through court decisions. I understand, judge, but i represent four couples. Their kids deserve two parents. They deserve them today and thats and they are entitled to those based on these notions of due process and equal protection. And especially when you look at the movement thats occurred. This is similar to the loving situation, which by the way, was a recognition case. I mean, that couple moved to d. C. , got married, then came back to virginia and were prosecuted because virginia wouldnt recognize the d. C. Marriage. At the time of the decision in 1967, there were 15 states that had repealed the ban on interracial marriage. There was momentum going in their favor, but the Supreme Court still struck down their prosecution. There was still 16 states that prohibited interracial marriage. Tha
So it depends on the intent of all 3 million voters who voted for this constitutional amendment. Thats an analysis thats literally impossible. You cant gauge into the mind of everybody who voted yes for proposition 1. I think thats distinguishable from rumor. And windsor, because the court in those cases didnt engage in the legislative intent of what the laws on their face and said the law on their face are unusual. And thats not the case here. So if theres no further questions, i respectfully ask the court to reverse the District Court. Mr. Murphy, can we go back to the 19th century history we were talking about . It occurred to me after you sat down that you thought i was talking about these the suffragists crisscrossing the country trying to get an amendment to the United States constitution. Thats not what they did. They knew that was virtually impossible. They were going to the local people trying to get the right to vote on the school board. They were going to each state legislat