Shes here to talk about the Upcoming Supreme Court confirmation involving judge Amy Coney Barrett. Thanks for being with us. Guest good morning. Host remind our viewers about the organization and where you stand politically. Guest we are looking to get judges confirmed to our committed to interpreting the constitution and the laws as they are written. You have any active role in the president s choice for Supreme Court . Guest thats the president s call and it is done through the White House Counsel Office but im thrilled, i felt like everyone he was looking at closely was really wellqualified. I felt like i couldnt be in a better position. I would have been happy if it was Amy Coney Barrett or barbara lagoa, he had some great choices. Host i suppose the question you are asked a lot these days is about the overall impact on the court and how it changes when it comes to the justices themselves. How would you answer that . Guest its a shift in perspective and how we look at the law versu
At 9 00 a. M. , headed tonights debate, university of missouris Mitchell Mckinney talks about the history of president ial debates. Host good morning, it is the washington journal for september 29 and your look looking at video at case western reserve theersity, that the site of first president ial debate between President Trump and joe biden. Cspans coverage of that event starts at 8 00. We want to hear from you in this first hour on when it comes to president ial debates, do they matter . Weathering helping you decide or perhaps hearing about candidates positions on policy issues. Heres how to call to let us know. If you support President Trump, 2027488000, if you support joe biden, 2027488001. If you are undecided or support others, it is 2027488002. If you want to text us, do so at 2027488003. cspanwj. Itter pollingeet journal to on president ial debates asking the questions on if they matter. Some of what they found saying more than 70 of americans say the debates wont matter much
Upcoming Supreme Court confirmation involving judge Amy Coney Barrett. Thanks for being with us. Guest good morning. Host remind our viewers about the organization and where you stand politically. Guest we are looking to get judges confirmed to our committed to interpreting the constitution and the laws as they are written. You have any active role in the president s choice for Supreme Court . Guest thats the president s call and it is done through the White House Counsel Office but im thrilled, i felt like everyone he was looking at closely was really wellqualified. I felt like i couldnt be in a better position. I would have been happy if it was Amy Coney Barrett or barbara lagoa, he had some great choices. Host i suppose the question you are asked a lot these days is about the overall impact on the court and how it changes when it comes to the justices themselves. How would you answer that . Guest its a shift in perspective and how we look at the law versus ruth bader ginsburg. In he
Manuscript of his experience of the cia. They came back to him and said to him and his publish of their 339 passages we have to delete they are revealing a National Security information for they went to court, they fought over, the cia cut that from three to 39 down to 168 and at the end of the day 30. The publisher put out the book with white spaces for the 30, boldface for the 160 they did in the tally for the other so as an object lesson in how subjective so much of this Government Data that was the formal start of the review process inside the process. So they dicker through the review process he did submit it before publishing the book . The case of monopoly to the Supreme Court was about a guy named frank who did not submit his book. That is what the judge is referring to the bolton case when he said bolton is risking losing his royalties. In 1980 he upheld the seizures of his book advance, all of his Royalty Income because he did not give the book to the cia for review. Now the
Liz the facts are, there are no inconsistencies to date and what terror read is saying about the Sexual Assault allegations against joe biden. Your reaction to the interview . My reactions are simple, not about whether he did or didnt do it, its a breathtaking hypocritical double standard in the kavanaugh manner because of political toxic city and the perception that Brett Kavanaugh would be the swing vote to the roe v. Wade. And that will happen in the first week and that never did. Lets get them back on to ask them why they said that. In kavanaugh, they said victims must be believed, today what they did, they took out the semantic toolbox and they change that to victims have to be heard. But the point i am making, theyre twisting themselves into semantic pretzels because her humiliated and embarrassed. Enter by the idea that they said everybody must believe willynilly, case closed, that goes against everything i learned as a lawyer in the last 35 years. Liz by the way tara reid is sa