Stay updated with breaking news from What mulvaney. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
why rob portman is hopeful. mick mulvaney is warning. and steny hoyer is fighting mad. they re all here and only here. we begin with blake burman with the latest. blake? it s clear here in the halls of the capitol as house republicans mark up their bill and the senate will release their bill later this week. there s a host of issues to work through. earlier today, the club for growth, an influential republican group put out a note saying they have issues with four different things on the individual side of this house republican plan. here they are. top tax bracket for millionaires with the possibility that those that make in the low million dollar range can see the top end taxed north of 45%. they take issue with a portion of pass-through profits would be taxed 25%. growth. you had big deficits. it wasn t tax cuts that did it. cuts create growth and growth creates revenues neil: but you left out ronald reagan. i know. deficits didn t grow with him. the first two years ....
Speechless. gabby orr and pamela brown report since the first time the hearings started, no one is dismissing this. abby phillip, just to get you up to speed. earlier in the show, i interviewed trump s former acting white house chief of staff, mick mulvaney. i asked him about the description we heard from cassidy hutchinson about disengaging, trying to tell him about threats and he was sitting on the couch scrolling. here s part of what mulvaney said. i was texting with a colleague of mine who was in the west wing at the time, and i said look, was mark just completely incompetent or was he having a nervous breakdown, and the response was it was a little built of both. the west wing was clearly broken, clearly broken, and the testimony yesterday actually made me feel bad for some of the good people who were still there to have to work in that environment where the chief of staff was so obviously disengaged. in case you were not sure which of the guys with the last names that start w ....
The mulvaney press conference, and then were in the public statements in the two weeks of testimony in front of the committee. and those basic facts are not contested as the report says here. it s up to congress now to decide who to do with those facts and that gets to your points about the historical significance of these acts and is this conduct that really any party for the future wants to consider as appropriate and acceptable for any president to engage in and that s why these proceedings are so important to create historical records. i would add, too, what mulvaney said in one sentence is absolutely true. of course this influence and lobbying in foreign affairs in this town. happens every day. however, corrupt influence in foreign affairs, ask paul manafort how that worked out for him. the point is, there are limitations to what you can do. you have to register. there are as i think yovanovitch and register as a foreign agent. yovanovitch, hill, others ....
Important investigation now and the american people deserve to hear about this. the real sort of immediate sin is that we don t know what mulvaney would say, what giuliani would say, what parnas would say, what bolton et cetera would say. that s still being hidden from view. that should be front and center now and instead it s just this sniping innuendo with no factual basis. one of the points you ve been making is abuse of power or obstruction by withholding dm i be an article of impeachment. i think they re preparing and it totally makes sense. that s the once response to the stonewall they ve received. thank you so much. ....
Desperately wanted? well mick mulvaney explained why that aid was held up. he said so on camera. now he said he did so, the president, because the president wanted an investigation into ukraine s role in the 2016 election. the look back to what happened in 2016 certainly was part of the thing that he was worried about in corruption with that nation and that is absolutely appropriate. with holding the funding. yeah. what you just describing is a quid pro quo. funding will not flow unless the investigation into the democratic server happened as well. we do that all the time with foreign policy. and i have news for everybody, get over it. there is go doing be political influence in foreign policy. so, yes, there was a quid pro quo on the military aid. and the other aid, $400 million worth according to mulvaney. now two points on what mulvaney said there. one, he later tried to unsay what he said. ....