the things that marjorie taylor greene says or the things that other whackos says for the glorification of vladimir putin. the attacking of zelenskyy. you know, violent imagery that we have seen time and time again from these house republicans. it s a nightmare for republican candidates over the next couple of years. it will be. i predict it will be a nightmare for them in 2024 when the map ought to favor republicans. democrats have very difficult seats to defend in montana, in west virginia, in ohio, but, it s a lot easier to defend those seats when, a, you have an incumbent, and b, the spokesperson for the other party is marjorie taylor greene or lauren boebert or donald trump, and it s all this crazy stuff. it s very very difficult to win
i m trying to help you. this is why you keep losing elections. it s true, actually. you have been trying to help them. i have been trying to help them out. what am i doing here. please don t put your hand on the hot stove. 2017. 2018, please, don t put your hand on again, and again and again. how many times do you have to put your hand on the stove before you realize donald trump burned you. you lose elections because of donald trump. you lose elections because you listen to extremists and whackos back in your district instead of middle class americans, main street republicans. independents. swing voters. people that want you to work together with everybody in washington, d.c. this dinner, i do think, was new level for trump republicans who might have been like, i m not that comfortable, but i like them. i don t think the images from
you re gaslighting. what does that have to do with the slander of paul pelosi? we sat by concern. because, geraldo, i answered your question directly, but you won t answer mine some thingses we can t do. some things wen t do. i have absolutely finished with the intolerant of these where do you think whackos get these ideas? they get these ideas because [inaudible conversations] entitle them. the president of the united states, not some random that old man got his head, his skull fractured. and the president of the united states used that horrific incident to indict people to disagree with him. howard: all right. i ve enjoyed i was waiting for things to heat up between you two. finally, geraldo, donald trump can t say anything about the attack on paul pelosi for a couple of days, then he said it was a terrible thing. and then he called in to a radio interview and said this: it s weird things going on in that household in the last couple of weeks.
listen, it s prohibitive. i really reject the argument of the whackos like aoc who says goes against his whole free speech platform. there s nothing un-free speech about this, making a business work. you have free speech. it s protected by the constitution the, not by the twitter board of directors, and you could do a lot of things which are free speech, including blog. but if you want to do it on musk s platform, you might have to pay. howard: on that point, and by the way, you don t have to pay, but musk tweeted the following: twitter has had a massive drop in revenue due to activist groups pressuring advertisers even though nothing has changed with contenteded moderation. that is the true. hasn t changed a thing so far. we tried to appease the activists, they re trying to destroy free speech in america. right. howard: whether he s scapegoating these activists or not, are these money-making schemes like you can send direct messages to celebrities going to fly? listen, i who kno
or stalin would want to have. those are arguments i ve heard for 30, 40 years. what we saw in uvalde actually was a twisted, warped system that allowed a deranged 18-year-old to buy a weapon of war that outgunned our own police officers. our own law enforcement officers who had to sit outside as they didn t have to. but they were ordered to sit outside while lit children bled out and died, and while teachers bled out and died because our police were outgunned because of the whackos, the extremists that say that the government can t do anything, can t ban weapons of war from 18-year-olds with psychological problems. i m sure 90% of americans don t