Are allegedly sending text messages to the white house and the day of the insurrection at the capitol, i think we already have a politicized supreme court. it s not just out this year. we can go back to 2016 when the republicans still needed that open a seat that president obama was entitled to fill, it goes way back. the real question here is if you want to rebalance the court by expanding it, how are you going to get this through the congress. for the way you cannot get the health protection act through congress, you cannot end the filibuster, you cannot get this through as well. the real question is, can you sustain this kind of energy through the midterm elections, which have been projected to be a loss with the democrats. use this to be gains so that you can actually do some of this domestic work that you want to do, whether it is passing the health protection act or ending the filibuster or doing something that crews could benefit from in terms of the court and its reform. presid
Midterms. we know, also from polling, that americans, while they have complex attitudes about abortion and do not want row overturned, or want the kinds of bans are merging from the states. if this is right, the question for aggressive is how do you operationalize that? how do you get people to act on abortion and row, rather than de-prioritizing the issue. i think we will see if they can do this in the upcoming midterms. professor marie, you talked about expanding it by two seats according to jones going from 9 to 13. well professor ziegler talked about avoiding a partisan hugh, what else would you fix if you are fixing it at this point? it makes sense to expand the court by four seats, what else would you do and say that this makes sure that four generations going forward we can rebuild the trust the public has in his court of not being partisan? academics have floated a number of proposals about a court reform. it is not just expanding the