Stay updated with breaking news from Very rich man. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Up, they say article 1 of constitution, would you pledge the divest? that is what they were rep reporting? president: i run hotels. much money i gave back. george washington very rich man. people don t know that. in his white house they had an office. he had a business desk and country desk. you are allowed to do that. i didn t do it. i put everything in trust. if i have a hotel and somebody comes in from china, that is a small amount of money. i was doing services. people staying in beautiful hotels because i have the best hotels, clubs. i have great stuff. they stayed there and pay. i don t get eight million ....
Family of artist Peter Max hope to get him out of guardianship nydailynews.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from nydailynews.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Share: Samuel Insull is mostly forgotten today by the general public, but from the 1890s through the 1930s he was one of the most prominent figures in the U.S. economy. Indeed, Insull was such a notable personality that Orson Welles borrowed a chapter from his life and fashioned it into a segment of the landmark film “Citizen Kane.” At the peak of his power, Insull’s fortune totaled roughly $100 million. But by the time of his death, he had only $1,000 to his name which had been sullied during the wreckage created by the Great Depression. Shining in Edison’s Glow: Insull was born in London in 1859, the son of a tradesman who focused his Sunday energies on being a Congregationalist lay preacher. Insull’s education was patchy and by the age of 14, he began a series of clerking jobs in London-based offices, including a stint as a stenographer for the publication Vanity Fair. ....
Small H Landscape (2001). (Photo by Ben Davis) An artist like KAWS is the best avatar: His main artistic device is to appropriate a familiar cartoon, tweak it, then tweak that tweaked appropriation again, and on and on, developing his own freestanding world. A genre of YouTube movie criticism you see a lot these days is centered around parsing the lore of the big pop nostalgia mythologies. “Criticism” is actually the wrong word it’s more like the cataloging of Easter eggs, the spotting of background references and links to source material and fan theories. Vast empires of content are spun out of this breezy sort of exegesis. It’s probably the ....