Live Breaking News & Updates on Vendor Information

Stay updated with breaking news from Vendor information. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Transcripts For CSPAN3 Senate Intel Panel Told 21 States Were Targeted By Russia In 2016 Election 20170622

Csp csp cspspan. Or cspan. Org. Next, a look at hacking attempts by russia which may have targeted as many as 21 u. S. States. We heard yesterday from the person in charge of Cyber Security for the Homeland Security department janet manfra and other intelligence officials. From capitol hill this is a little over three hours. Hearing is in order. Today the committee convenes the sixth open hearing of 2017 to further examine russias interference in the election. This is an opportunity for the committee and the American People to drill down on this vitally important topic. In 2016 a hostile foreign power reached down into the state and local levels to touch voter data. It employed sophisticated cyber tools and capabilities and helped moscow to potentially build detailed knowledge of how our elections work. There was ano ....

New York , United States , Connie Lawson , Justin America , Jeh Johnson , Ronald Reagan , James Comey , Jim Comey , Hillary Clinton , Michael Haas , Cyber Security , Homeland Security , Homeland Security Department , Security Department , Capitol Hill , Opportunity Committee , American People , Tell Us , First Panel , Second Panel , Illinois State , National Association , Association State , National Associations , Election Security , Us Ground ,

Transcripts For CSPAN Senate Intel Panel Told 21 States Were Targeted By Russia In 2016 Election 20170622

Convenes the committee to examine the russian interference in the u. S. Elections. This is an opportunity for the American People to drill down on this important topic. In 2016, and hostile foreign power reached down into the state and local levels to touch voter data. It employed relatively sophisticated cyber tools and capabilities and helped moscow potentially build detailed knowledge of how our collections work. It was another example of russian efforts to interfere in a democracy with the goal of undermining our system. Were woefully unprepared to defend and respond, and i am hopeful we will not be caught flatfooted again. Our witnesses are here to tell us more about what happened in 2016, what that tells us about russian intentions, and what we should expect in 28 team and 20 in 2018. If we do not work with the states to secure our elections, we could be here in two or four years, talking about a worse crisis. The hearing w ....

North Carolina , United States , West Virginia , James Comey , Thomas Massie , Jeh Johnson , Connie Lawson , Hillary Clinton , American People , Tell Us , Second Panel , Illinois State , Election Security , Us Ground , Cyber Division , Division Within , Office Intelligence , Intelligence Analysis Department , Analysis Department , Department Homeland , National Protection , National Protection Programs , Intelligence Community , Voter Registration , Bad News , Russian Hackers ,

Transcripts For SFGTV 20150129

C as set forth in the [inaudible]. Speaker mr. Keane. Speaker ill second that. Those two specific aspects, the Supreme Court of the United States has been rather definitive that thats something that we cannot indeed enforce. And we did vote a few months ago exactly the way commissioner reanne is proposing and we voted unanimously thats not in our power. On those i dont have a problem with, and i think its redundant and i second mr. Hurt. Speaker all in favor. Speaker aye. Speaker opposed. Hearing none that motion passes. Speaker can you go to the next. Speaker thank you, chair. The second set of amendments is with respect to reporting requirements for third parties who are involved in supporting or opposing candidates for city elections and the city has instituted three c fro a number of reporting requirements over the years, which are designed for primarily for two things. One ....

United States , San Francisco , Los Angeles , Supreme Court , Supreme Court United , Supreme Court United States , Court United , Court United States , Second Set , State Law , Ethics Commission , Filing Requirements , End Commission , Communications Reference , One Way , Way Way , Vendor Information , Member Communications , Communications Speaker , Third Party , Party Come , Political Parties , Public Comment , Ballot Campaign , Campaign Someone , Running Office ,

Transcripts For SFGTV 20150203

Those two specific aspects, the Supreme Court of the United States has been rather definitive that thats something that we cannot indeed enforce. And we did vote a few months ago exactly the way commissioner reanne is proposing and we voted unanimously thats not in our power. On those i dont have a problem with, and i think its redundant and i second mr. Hurt. Speaker all in favor. Speaker aye. Speaker opposed. Hearing none that motion passes. Speaker can you go to the next. Speaker thank you, chair. The second set of amendments is with respect to reporting requirements for third parties who are involved in supporting or opposing candidates for city elections and the city has instituted three c fro a number of reporting requirements over the years, which are designed for primarily for two things. One is general disclosure to the public. So that the public can fairly judge messa ....

United States , San Francisco , Los Angeles , Supreme Court , Supreme Court United , Supreme Court United States , Court United , Court United States , Second Set , State Law , Ethics Commission , Filing Requirements , End Commission , Communications Reference , One Way , Way Way , Vendor Information , Member Communications , Communications Speaker , Third Party , Party Come , Political Parties , Public Comment , Ballot Campaign , Campaign Someone , Running Office ,

Transcripts For SFGTV 20150131

Thank you. Speaker so im happy to hear from other commissioners on this particular one. I mean, to me this one seems pretty clear. If we think we need to defer it to another meeting, im happy to consider this with other issues, but i also dont want to have to revisit things that weve already addressed. You know, to mr. Bushs point, i also dont think that we have to deal with all c fro changes in one meeting. Theres other c fro changes we can address. I do think mr. Bush raises a good point if there are things that we havent addressed that we should be, lets take those up. I dont know that we should holdup all proposed changes because it doesnt include everyone we want to change in c fro. But i open it up to my fellow commissioners. Speaker im prepared to move that we on Decision Point 1 that we approved the section 1. 114 a 2 and 1. 114 c as set forth in the [inaudible]. Speaker mr. Keane. Speaker ill second that. Those two specif ....

United States , San Francisco , Los Angeles , Decision Point , Supreme Court , Supreme Court United , Supreme Court United States , Court United , Court United States , Second Set , State Law , Ethics Commission , Filing Requirements , End Commission , Communications Reference , One Way , Way Way , Vendor Information , Member Communications , Communications Speaker , Third Party , Party Come , Political Parties , Public Comment , Ballot Campaign , Campaign Someone ,