Stay updated with breaking news from Valerie rao. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
In fear of eminent death or great bodily harm. the reasonable person standard is objective. it s not subjective so the jury gets to think how would i feel if i was hit maybe one time, is it reasonable to fear for my life? you ve got an expert medical examiner saying these injuries were insignificant. they weren t life-threatening. i think that goes to the ultimate question, my goodness, could he really bring that gun to a fist fight? right. sunny hostin, danny cevallos thank you for the insight, we ll back with you tomorrow, maybe even later today. so we head back to the wall. very important stuff that s going to happen today. they re going to bring someone on to say that george zimmerman knew all about stand your ground and self-defense, why, because they want to make the case that george zimmerman said everything that was convenient to make this a case he could get away with so today another huge day, but yesterday we had it called even. after what the prosecution was able to do. n ....
Insignificant. are the defendant s injuries consistent with having repeatedly been slammed into a concrete surface? no. why not. because if you look at them, they are minor. to me, slam implies great force. the resultant injuries are not grateful. how bad were zimmerman s injuries. i m struck here by what the medical examiner, valerie rao said, she never saw in person as far as i understand it, zimmerman. she didn t examine him as a physician, did she? no, no, not at all. she was working from photographs, not that that s necessarily precluding her from giving an opinion. medical examiner s often work ....
This is not the medical examiner who performed the autopsy on trayvon martin. instead, it is a witness who was called on by the state to examine this question given the wounds we ve seen on zimmerman s head, was he really in danger of being killed himself? images of george zimmerman bloodied and beaten up, important visuals for his defense, trying to show that zimmerman s head had been slammed against the sidewalk and we to fire his gun to save his own life. that s not the way jacksonville based medical examiner valerie rao sees it. are the injuries consistent with having been repeatedly slammed into a concrete service. reporter: no. reporter: rao testified the injuries were not life-threatening, consistent with being punched or hitting a concrete surface once but during cross-examination, rao admitted when pressed by attorney mark o mara he could have been hit multiple tiles. the jury also heard from a man ....
From photographs in their normal work. they re also working with exa examses of bodies. she did opine that injury to the nose wasn t significant and the injury to the head did not seem significant. the cuts in the back of the head, the bruising and things like that, they could have come from one strike, which i felt a little hard to swallow, and i tend to believe that if valerie rao had been injured with a nose like that, she wouldn t think they were insignificant. that being said, the prosecution scored some points in trying to play down the severity of the injury injuries the problem is, that s not a factor in self-defense. the person doesn t have to be injured. all they have to do is be in fear for their life. that s what the jury has to look at. i m not a physician, i have no real understanding of the severity of mr. zimmerman s injuries or not. it sounds to me like valerie is a bit of a flake, who just found this from a jacksonville paper. ....
Welcome back to hannity. the prosecution called medical examiner valerie rao to the stand. she testified about the seriousness of george zimmerman s injuries. take a look at part of what she had to say today. when you said re-enactment, was that an interview, where he conducted a walk-through and led investigators through the scene and explained to them what happened? yes. after reviewing all those items, in terms of severitseverw would you classify the injuries to the defendant s head? they were not life threatening, they were very insignificant, they did not require any sutures to be applied. so as i would refer to them as ....