Live Breaking News & Updates on Ushealth Advisors

Stay updated with breaking news from Ushealth advisors. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Storytelling & Professional Plaintiffs: The District Court for the Northern District of Texas Denies Class Certification in TCPA Case | Troutman Pepper


In
Hirsch v. USHealth Advisors, LLC, Judge Pittman, of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, denied Aaron Hirsch’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Class Certification, which was based on allegations that USHealth Advisors, LLC (“USHA”) and USHealth Group, Inc. (“USGA”) (collectively “Defendants”) violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and Maryland equivalent of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. In doing so, the Court put a dent in claims where professional plaintiffs seek to profit off the TCPA.
In that case, Plaintiff developed a plan to “profit through the TCPA.” When Plaintiff was called by a lead-generation vendor, Plaintiff, on multiple occasions, stated he was interested in buying health insurance (although he was not), scheduled a phone call with a USHA agent, and, after receiving the call from the USHA agent, asked to be placed on the internal do not call list. When Plaintiff received subsequent calls and ....

United States , Ushealth Group Inc , Ushealth Advisors , United States District Court , Judge Pittman , Northern District , Aaron Hirsch , Class Certification , Telephone Consumer Protection Act , Telephone Consumer Protection , Federal Rules , Civil Procedure , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , உஷ்ேல்த் குழு இன்க் , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் மாவட்டம் நீதிமன்றம் , நீதிபதி பிட்மேன் , வடக்கு மாவட்டம் , ஆரோன் ஹர்ஶ் , வர்க்கம் சிஇஆர்டிஐஎஃப்ஐசிஏடிஐஓஎன் , தொலைபேசி நுகர்வோர் ப்ரொடெக்ஶந் நாடகம் , தொலைபேசி நுகர்வோர் ப்ரொடெக்ஶந் , கூட்டாட்சியின் விதிகள் , சிவில் ப்ரொஸீஜர் ,

Professional Plaintiff Can't Represent Class


Tuesday, December 29, 2020
A recent denial of a professional plaintiff’s motion for class certification shows that, irrespective of whether such plaintiffs have standing to sue on their own behalf, courts are increasingly skeptical that contrived claims are amenable to class treatment. 
See Hirsch v. USHealth Advisors, LLC, No. 4:18-CV-00245-P, 2020 WL 7186380, at 1 (N.D. Tex. Dec. 7, 2020).
The Facts
The plaintiff in this case, Aaron Hirsch, was a real estate agent who used his cell phone for both business and personal use. He had listed his cell phone number on the national Do-Not-Call Registry, but also advertised his business using his cell phone number and even took partial tax deductions for his cell phone. Eventually, Hirsch and his friend Max Maccoby, a lawyer, developed a plan to profit through the TCPA. Hirsch would log any telemarketing calls that he received, and Maccoby would review the log for potential TCPA litigation. Through this sche ....

United States , Max Maccoby , Aaron Hirsch , Court Order , National Do , Ushealth Advisors , Do Not Call Registry , National Do Not Call Registry , Internal Do Not Call , Federal Rule , Defendant Agents , 5th Citcuit , Hirschv Ushealth Advisors , Telemarketing Calls , Phone Used For Business , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , ஆரோன் ஹர்ஶ் , நீதிமன்றம் ஆர்டர் , தேசிய செய் , செய் இல்லை அழைப்பு பதிவு , தேசிய செய் இல்லை அழைப்பு பதிவு , உள் செய் இல்லை அழைப்பு , கூட்டாட்சியின் ஆட்சி , டெலிமார்க்கெட்டிங் அழைப்புகள் , தொலைபேசி பயன்படுத்தப்பட்டது க்கு வணிக ,