however many years, and then make a decision, make a call, say what you think is happening, say what you think will happen. and i think that s the main difference of thejob. the challenge is getting as many different sources as you possibly can in all the different palaces to speak to you as frequently as possible, and that s kind of easier said than done. and, laura, let me just bring you in. do you think there s space for criticism in royal reporting or, to your mind, is it all a bit deferential and unquestioning? i mean, in my opinion, i i think there s not enough critical coverage - of the royal family, but i don t think that s necessarily the fault . of individualjournalists. i agree with what s been saidi around how it s the structures that are built in, so things like the royal rota system, for example, - that gives access to particular types ofjournalists that you need to apply to . and which then might limit maybe more independentl journalists, for example, - to get access t
say what you think will happen. and i think that s the main difference of thejob. the challenge is getting as many different sources as you possibly can in all the different palaces to speak to you as frequently as possible. and that s kind of easier said than done. and, laura, let me just bring you in. do you think there s space for criticism in royal reporting or to your mind, is it all a bit deferential and unquestioning? i mean, i think there s not enough critical coverage . of the royal family, i but i don t think that s necessarily the fault - of individualjournalists. i agree with what s been said around how it s- the structures that are built in. - so things like the royal rota system, for example, - that gives access to particular types ofjournalists that you need to apply - to and which then might limit maybe more independent journalists, for example, | to get access to those stories. and i did. i did interviews with some royal correspondents, - actually, for some research,
the challenge is getting as many different sources as you possibly can in all the different palaces to speak to you as frequently as possible. and that s kind of easier said than done. and, laura, let me just bring you in. do you think there s space for criticism in royal reporting or to your mind, is it all a bit deferential and unquestioning? i mean, i think there s not enough critical coverage . of the royal family, but i don t think that s necessarily the fault of individualjournalists. i agree with what s been said around how it s- the structures that are built in. so things like the royal rota system, for example, - that gives access to particular- types ofjournalists that you need to apply to and which then might limit maybe more independent. journalists, for example, - to get access to those stories. and i did. i did interviews with some royal correspondents, - actually, for some research, and they were telling me, i i if you re in these institutions i like the bbc or big new
and eat it. also, as you mentioned, a lot of these communities this is not about immigration. tucker carlson talks about legacy americans. you talk about white americans, when in fact there were brown and black americans who have also been in the past generations. black and rounds were the beginning of the country. three years ago, when it gunman opened fire inside a walmart in el paso texas, the response from a lot of conservatives in the magazines of the national review was an quite inch unquestioning of white supremacy. this week in response to a gunman opening fire at a buffalo supermarket, a lot of the response has been well, we condemn the violence, but the theory behind it, well, there s truth to it. we should not condemn the idea that democrats are using this political rhetoric. a lot of change even in between 2018 and 19. and now! maybe, that is the scariest
fewer doctors, not to mention the strain caused by the pandemic all this means the pressure on gps shows no sign of easing. doctors and patients alike are having to adapt to new ways of working. dominic hughes, bbc news, bootle. an environmental activist deceived into a relationship with an undercover officer has won a landmark tribunaljudgement against the metropolitan police for breaching her human rights. kate wilson had a sexual relationship with met officer mark kennedy in 2003. the tribunal found either senior met officers were quite extraordinarily naive and totally unquestioning, or chose to turn a blind eye. 27 other women are still going through the legal process having been duped by undercover policemen. a 96 year old woman who was a secretary in a nazi concentration camp is in custody in germany tonight. she was arrested after going on the run from her care home