“It is surprising,” Marnie Holborow writes, “how often in Marxist accounts of women’s oppression Frederick Engels is overlooked.” In responding to this gap in…
This article will be released in full online February 7, 2022. Eleanor Burke Leacock taught that transhistorical, universal male dominance is a myth, not a fact.
In recent years, there has been little discussion of Marx's writings on gender and the family, but in the 1970s and '80s, these writings were subject to a great…
significance in light of the trump presidency. the reason we are so interested in your view, that case was wrongly decided, it has little to do with the statute that was in question. it has everything to do with your views on the power of the executive. and what that would mean for this president and future president if you join the supreme court. justice scalia, is sold to send embraces the so-called unitary theory, which granted sweeping power for the president of the united states. scalia said and i quote we should say here that the president constitutionally, his duties include complete control over an investigation and prosecution of violation of law and that the command of article two is clear and definite period of the power must be vested in the president of the united states.
alan you can t have an act that s constitutional under articles one and two and at the same time is criminal. you must have a legal act. it would under cut the power of the president questioning why he pardon and why he fire? once he did it, you cannot question, just like you cannot question the senator and a judge for their vote in the supreme court. their laws are full of examples of acts that are otherwise legal. not by the president. but made illegal by the intent insider trading being a perfect example. but, you have said this that the president, you know has this unfair ability to act. what s the authority for that? unitary theory, that s controversy that not everybody agrees with. the act is trading, having