Host will you for your politics is anyone. I think marsha left would be the easiest way to summon up. P. J. i was a leftwinger but, i did not make enough sense to actually be a communist or anything like that. Host when did the transformation occur. P. J. it was gradual. There is a book coming out, i just about this. Its coming out from the Hoover Institution is backing this. It is called why i turned right. This is to rebut a bunch of us who went right. It is a long story in a motel it will give you the short version. I was a radical left. Very much in favor of some sort of socialist thing in america. I got a job. And i get the job paying 150 a week. I was a messenger in new york. That was a lot of money as far as i was concerned. I was living down in the lower east side. I was very broke. I get paid every two weeks. I was really looking forward to that 300 bucks. And so was my landlord mistake. In my drug dealer. Among other people. I got my first paycheck and i got down to 178 or so
Reasons. Although they have directed their challenge to the statutory limit, they stipulated the first 200 50,000 of his loan was repaid with preElection Funds. The statute does not currently restrict the senators ability to obtain full repayment. The current regulatory barrier to repayment is selfinflicted. Appellees could have avoided injuries by behaving as they would have if the statute and regulations did not exist. They went out of their way to engage in transactions they would not otherwise have undertaken, solely to subject the senator to a financial loss and thereby lay the groundwork for a lawsuit. That self infliction of injury, for no purpose other than to facilitate , severed the causal link between the challenged laws and senator cruzs injury. On the merits, the loan repayment limit is constitutional. It imposes insubstantial burdens on the financing of electoral campaigns and targets a practice that has significant corruptive potential. A postelection contributor general
Reasons. Although they have directed their challenge to the statutory limit, they stipulated the first 200 50,000 of his loan was repaid with preElection Funds. The statute does not currently restrict the senators ability to obtain full repayment. The current regulatory barrier to repayment is selfinflicted. Appellees could have avoided injuries by behaving as they would have if the statute and regulations did not exist. They went out of their way to engage in transactions they would not otherwise have undertaken, solely to subject the senator to a financial loss and thereby lay the groundwork for a lawsuit. That self infliction of injury, for no purpose other than to facilitate , severed the causal link between the challenged laws and senator cruzs injury. On the merits, the loan repayment limit is constitutional. It imposes insubstantial burdens on the financing of electoral campaigns and targets a practice that has significant corruptive potential. A postelection contributor general
Reasons. Although they have directed their challenge to the statutory limit, they stipulated the first 200 50,000 of his loan was repaid with preElection Funds. The statute does not currently restrict the senators ability to obtain full repayment. The current regulatory barrier to repayment is selfinflicted. Appellees could have avoided injuries by behaving as they would have if the statute and regulations did not exist. They went out of their way to engage in transactions they would not otherwise have undertaken, solely to subject the senator to a financial loss and thereby lay the groundwork for a lawsuit. That self infliction of injury, for no purpose other than to facilitate , severed the causal link between the challenged laws and senator cruzs injury. On the merits, the loan repayment limit is constitutional. It imposes insubstantial burdens on the financing of electoral campaigns and targets a practice that has significant corruptive potential. A postelection contributor general
The committee will come to order. The chair is authorized to declare a risk a recess at any time. Entitledng is examining the Equifax Breach. September 7, equifax announced what it called a Cyber Security incident. 145 million u. S. Consumers, nearly half of all americans. If you are hearing my voice your either the victim of the breach or know someone who is. Thats how massive this was. Criminals got everything they need to steal your identity, open credit card accounts in thise and cause you may be the most harmful the world has ever seen. The companys response has left much to be desired. Equifax failed to disclose the breach to shareholders for weeks. Senior executives sold their equifax shares after the company knew of the breach but before they disclosed the breach. The federal trade commission will get to the the Justice Department will get to the bottom of this. By the federal trade commission is required. Congress must insure federal regulators do their jobs so justice can be