general misled the public about whether or not there was sort of lower case c collusion here. and it sounds like his conclusion after looking at the report and see there was. and he has gone further in in twitter thread if a than some democrats have. so i do think now it s not going to make speaker pelosi to your we goo go forward with impeachment proceedings monday morning at 8:00. but it s giving fresh fodder on both suds of the ace toll relitigate points in the report. but, david, do you think there lead other republicans to follow under amash s cover, you know, following in his call for impeachment or his break from the president? no, not any time soon. but i think what congressman amash saw here was two opportunities. one it s possible i don t this. but it s possible this is a sign post on the way to amash running for president as libertiarian. it s also possible that amash looked at history and said there is a job opening here to be the
interpret it differently. greg: confirmation bias. jesse: when we talk about the trump tower meeting. it s a nothing burger and uc collusion. jedediah: you see a big mac. greg: scott adams. it s the movies. you show them one truth but they see two different movies. juan: that is the team sports you talk about. this is actual perspective. jesse: people here db differently. jedediah: sometimes older people are less sensitive to high-frequency and certain letters have a certain frequency. it depends on how jesse: so the younger people at the table here yanny. jedediah: i think you would hear something complete different. greg: i heard collusion. that s all i kept hearing. collusion. juan: my wife says to me
mueller s investigation, is fueling questions about collusion and conspiracy. is collusion a crime? here s a hint. no. let s discuss this with jeffrey toobin and lawrence tribe. boy, oh, boy, this is a battle of the big brains this morning. let s start with one general conception/misconception that collusion is what bob mueller is looking for and collusion is a crime we are going to hear about. jeffrey, let s start with you? he may be looking for c collusion, and even if there was some sort of coordination between the trump campaign and russia, the question of whether there was a crime is not answered by finding out whether there was some sort of
to publicly shoot down details about the russia investigation. one of those men admiral mike be rogers is facing questions at this hour. as the story comes up, we ll listen to his response together. also on the hill today, john brennan testified on the investigation. i encountered and am aware of information and intelligence that revealed contacts and interactions between russian officials and u.s. persons involved in the trump campaign. by the time i left office on january 20th, i had unresolved questions in my mind as to whether or not the russians had been successful in getting u.s. persons involved in the campaign or not to work on their behalf again either in a witting or unwitting fashion. did you see evidence of c collusion, coordination,