Laura Ingraham shines a spotlight on everyday Americans and examines how their lives are affected by politics at the federal, state and local level. Professional Intelligence Officer rather than saying this on msnbc or writing it in the press, he mightve gone straight to the Special Counsel and explained what his concerns were. But the problem is that its not just our own citizens who are listening john brennan, there are foreign governments and spies feelings stealing secrets on our behalf who are going to believe that john brennan and something that we dont earn their trust in our government is going to be degraded, our National Security will be impacted negatively. The second point i would make quickly is that those who signed this letter might question whether they want to be tethered to john brennan, who is really the weak link in this chain here. Hes not a credible witness. I think that those who are concerned about a Security Clearance issue and maybe feel like the cia, who held
Laura Ingraham shines a spotlight on everyday Americans and examines how their lives are affected by politics at the federal, state and local level. That is going to say, no, the president doesnt have the authority to take away somebody Security Clearance . They act like there is some sort of property right to keep a Security Clearance for post government work. There is no such thing. What he is doing is irresponsible and selfish because he is identified with the Intelligence Community. I was a member of that. It makes all of us looks like a bunch of partisan hacks when he goes off in every direction spewing all this vitriol, it really reflects poorly on the Intelligence Community. People sit back and say, well, now we know what he was thinking when he was head of the cia. It doesnt reflect well. Jason i think it does undercut the credibility of an agency that prides itself on being a nonpartisan and apolitical. Newt gingrich was on Fox And Friends this morning. Lets listen to his Poin
documents. it is unnerving for us lawyers to think of waving an available privilege but i think it might deserve the message pretty well for the president overall, witches, even though he doesn t like this probe, he s willing to be cooperative and give them what they want. jason: james, is giuliani right? if mcgahn had evidence of a crime or something going on in the white house, he wouldn t be here, right? i think is a pretty good assumption. i think that s probably right. i hesitate only because rudy might change his comments any minute. but overall, i think you ve got this one right. jason: scott, do you think giuliani made the right assessment and his comments right? i don t think he knows what he s talking about in the sense that he doesn t know what mcgahn said for those 30 hours, neither does trump pray they know what his lawyers aside. the fact that he took a lawyer in shows that he was concerned about not only maintaining his integrity, but also the fact that he did ha
in. laura ingraham has been talking about this for a long time. we have to do a lot more for chicago. this isn t a casual discussion for anyone. there s lives on the line, my brother almost lost his life last year due to the violence in chicago. a 3-year-old was shot this weekend. a three year old. jason: we are talking about a city here. these numbers are astronomical and i see feeling policies. if you want different results, you have to do different things and probably instill different people. i don t know how you can reelect a guy like rahm emanuel. rahm emanuel must go. he s been nothing but a failure. i m sure mr. tall, even as a democrat, can agree that rahm emanuel is a failure that must leave. no question about it. jason: what gianno is advocating is to not only bring donald trump in for a visit and a rally or what not not a visit. we need solutions. we need god to bring something to bear. jason: the question is, would you support bringing in donald trump and would